Bernard Hopkins is a TOP 10 ATG.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ALTimegreat, Jul 2, 2012.


  1. general zod

    general zod World Champion Full Member

    6,744
    51
    Apr 7, 2010
    The division did have some depth around the late 80's to early 90's. Imo it has been dead since Jones left back in 94
     
  2. general zod

    general zod World Champion Full Member

    6,744
    51
    Apr 7, 2010
    I really cant see how a case can be made for him being anywhere near the top 10. He would need at least a few wins over prime atg's to get close
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    he got schooled by a kid 4 years younger and 21 fights
    holyfield fought for the title after 11 fights
    michael spinks 16 fights
    leon spinks 8 fights
    ray mercer 17 fights
    Lennex 22 fights
    michael carbahal 14 fights
    kittasem 11 fights
    tim withersppon 15 fights
    ossie occasio was 15-2 for his second crack at a world title...

    point being... he had plenty of fights...and he he not only lost, he got toyed with... but it sounds much better when people just admit he got taken to school...than to come up with all the reasons why he was taken to school and most are just excuses
     
  4. Brownies

    Brownies Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,776
    8
    Aug 16, 2010
    Hopkins is an ATG and that is a great honour. Top 10 ? No way ! Boxing's got a too rich history.
     
  5. RODNEY MORASH

    RODNEY MORASH C♯ Sharp or B♭ Flat Full Member

    1,154
    0
    Mar 17, 2012
  6. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    Look at that list of Olympic champions and guys with top amateur careers for the most part, you cant in honesty say that they are the same level cause of the pro fight amount, you are being entirley unrealistic

    actually makes him look better IMO
     
  7. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    Roy Jones beat Hopkins way more clear than Calzaghe.. and a Better Hopkins in my opinion.
     
  8. Chempasillo

    Chempasillo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,431
    1
    Feb 5, 2011

    logic, prime jones is always arguably the best boxer ever. so why should he not beat X more clearer?

    yet calzaghe beat X prety easy, X was doing **** but running away and hiding and trying to hold, you dont win fights by doing that.
     
  9. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    why you sucking off nasty nas. Nasty nas is just a nas fan boy who is still listening to Nas - I Can while on this thread to have the incitement to hang in with the real deal realsoulja.

    Charley Burley was probably the greatest fighter to never win a title, he never won any title at MW. So how possibly can he have a greater resume than BHop? Besides his best weight was Welter weight.

    Dick Tiger loses to Welterweight Griffith, but Hopkins is attacked for beating Welterweights?

    Face it, all you BHop haters, Hopkins is a top 10 MW ATG :deal

    All those other guys, I dont know, but Hopkin's MW resume is up there with Monzon's and Haglers, and shits on top of Dick Tiger's of the modern era.
     
  10. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I don't know?? Ask the man I quoted.:lol:
     
  11. Skins

    Skins Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,358
    2,806
    Oct 20, 2011
    To me, beating a bunch of crap fighters does not make you and ATG. We all have our own opinions, of course, and being from Philly I have always tried to like Hopkins, but he just turns me off. Never been impressed by him
     
  12. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    Hopkins put two great performaces which I could watch over and over. But then again his best names in his resume have been smaller guys. The guy did some amazing things, but then again was involve in many illegal dirty tactics. His refusal and tantrum for refusing random testing against Pascal should be question and his Academy Award acting abilities have gone out of control many times. Hopkins IQ is amazing in the ring, but he will always be one of those fighters that you could mention many positive things, but negative equally.
     
  13. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Jones didnt land as often, and didnt have a scorecard as clear as Calzaghe.
    Also that was Hopkins who had no title experience rather than a fighter who knew his way around world title fights. When Jones beat him he couldnt beat Mercado in his next attempt. When Calzaghe beat him it was sandwiched between his best wins of Tarver, Wright and Pavlik
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    When Hopkins fought Tito, Tito had only had one MW fight. ONE.
    People forget that Tito had looked lucky against Oscar and been down seven times that I know of, yet that was Hopkins big MW win? I think his win over Holmes was better
     
  15. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    wo wo wo calm down kid :|.
    I just pointed out to Nastnas, how you rate yourself as a historian, only for nastnas to completely dominate you.
    Thats not sucking off anyone :patsch, that was you being given a similar beat down to the ones I administer to you.
    You keep saying things about sucking people off and sucking balls, which is a bit odd, that you should perhaps keep to yourself weirdo.
    Anyway, you have had it tough lately on here, so just accept you were owned by Nastynas and move on like a good boy