You went full ****** mode on your reply. Try rereading my post. My point was that CompuBox guys are instructed to make no judgement on the quality of the punch. The need to make only a distinction between jab and power punch. If you look at the video, the video poster obviously missed some punches probably because he felt the punch was ineffective (like the arm punch to the body early in the round and a grazing shot to the head). Not to mention he is depending on a slow motion of a broadcast. If you are a hardcore boxing fan you should know that is very different when seating ringside visually and aurally. It could be a grazing punch to the shoulder, but they must count it. I say only half ****** because CompuBox is obviously flawed. Even HBO announcers have said this, but as they said, "It is the ONLY system viable right now". Until a ****ing computer and a cyborg can come up with a better system, it is what it is. What makes it worse if ****ing fans and hardcore fans alike taking it as some holy numbers and crying when it does not support their agenda. CompuBox is GENERALLY accurate but it is not perfect.