Would Langford Be Badly Beaten BY Modern Heavies?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 7, 2012.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,620
    27,308
    Feb 15, 2006
    Valuev is certainly much better than any other fighter of his size who has fought at world level, but at the same time he is no world beater.

    I have never bought into the argument that smaller ATGs would not be able to reach his chin. In the few cases we have of similar height disparities, they seem to manage.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    But you can visually see that Hatton who is the same height as Langford can't reach his face. You've listed a random none boxer who was giant, Valuev for his size has decent skills maybe superior to Willard, he's not simply an OAF

    Fulton wasn't great either and you seem to consider that a good win for Fulton. Fighting a 6'5 fighter was undoubtedly an issue for Langford

    Qawi is similar to Langford, maybe 5'9 Tua is, contrary to what many believe Tua had very good technical skills but had problems giving up height so often

    Langford generally got beat by the good big men of his time, ie Jack Johnson and Wills.

    He beat world level opponents so he is a world beater

    No there isn't 'similar height disparities' Haye and Holyfield are 8/9inches taller than Langford, massive difference
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,620
    27,308
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  4. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Am I reading that chart wrong or is Hatton like 5'2''. And David Haye under 6'.
     
  5. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012