Dividing the Heavyweight Division

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Collie, Jul 11, 2012.


  1. Collie

    Collie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    8
    Jun 16, 2012
    I sometimes wondered about whether the Heavyweight division should be divided further by weights. For example in the Olympics there is light heavy, heavy and super heavy. I have never heard any debate about it as such, has it ever been proposed to add the division Super-heavyweight?

    Playing the devils advocate, off the top of my head, here are some of the potential pros and cons:

    Pros:
    - Yes. In all other weight classes, both fighters are usually the same weight, give or take a few pounds. Weight can make a huge difference. In the heavyweight division, one fighter could outweigh the other by 30, 40 or 50 pounds.
    - More competitive/evenly matched fights, amongst people who are of a more similar weight
    - If there were a heavyweight and super-heavyweight division, it would be still possible for the heavyweight champ to challenge the super-heavyweight champ. Such fights might bring more excitement into an as-of-late unexciting division.
    - Such a reform would enable the governing bodies to reform both divisions by eliminating some of the belts and having just one unified heavyweight and super-heavyweight championship belt.


    Cons:
    - The difference in weight is not relevant once you get to heavyweight. Muhammad Ali won the light-heavyweight Gold and went on to be possibly the best Heavyweight in the professional ranks.
    - There are too many belts/weight-classes already. We don't need that spilling over into the heavyweight division, where fighters may start bouncing between heavy and super-heavy and catchweights may become an issue. The thought that the governing bodies would bring in one unified super-heavyweight belt is wishful thinking.
    - It diminishes the prestige historically connected with being the Heavyweight champion of the world.
    - It may prevent fights from happening. A heavyweight and super-heavyweight may not fight each-other in favour of fighting others in their weight class: this fight would have happened if there was no super-heavyweight division.


    Your thoughts? Should a new division 'Super-heavyweight' be introduced in the professional ranks?
     
  2. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    I have suggested this a couple years back on this forum & was basically told to F'off & most were against it.

    This thread will be interesting to see how many have changed their views.
     
  3. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    The only thing you do is limit opposition for the current champs. If the trend continues, I wouldn't mind seeing CW limit increased to 215 since current CWs are allowed to challenge the HW champion if they got the balls anyways.

    With a SHW division, you essentially limit the true Champ to fighting the likes of Gabe Brown and super fat asses.

    It's not Fury's, or K2, or Ustinovs, or Wachs, or Prices fault they are giants. But in HW boxing there is no limit. If you wanna get fat, get fat if you think you can compete. Nobody is forcing Chambers or Adamek to fight the K2. But by raising the CW limit to 215, guys like Haye could comfortably fight without draining and dominate.
     
  4. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
    I couldn't disagree more. The Heavyweight division's weight is unlimited, and always has been. You know, Light Heavyweight used to mean just that, "Light" Heavyweight. And then came Cruiserweight, which wasn't a bad idea in my view. The next change was adding 10 lbs. to Cruiserweight, thus bringing it to 200 lbs. So adding a Super Heavyweight division is not a good idea. Do we really need Light Heavy, Cruiser, Heavy and Super Heavy? That would make a total of 18 weight divisions. How then would we have seen W. Klitschko-Chambers or W. Klitschko-Haye?

    The smaller heavyweights have proven to be able to beat the bigger guys before. Both Ruslan Chagaev and David Haye are smaller heavyweights and they are the only two guys to beat Nikolai Valuev. Evander Holyfield should have won his fight against Valuev and he too is a small heavyweight. Eddie Chambers had no trouble with Alexander Dimitrenko. Tomasz Adamek has beaten a number of bigger guys. These are just a few examples.

    The Heavyweight division needs to be left alone. Creating a Super Heavyweight division is like raping the history of this great sport. A lot of great Heavyweight Champions of the past would be Cruiserweights by today's standards. Jack Dempsey, Gene Tunney, Rocky Marciano and Floyd Patterson just to name a few. Just because the big guys of today are more talented then at any time in the past, doesn't mean we need a new weight class. Who are the really talented Super Heavys anyway? The Klitschko brothers. They are well ahead of the other "big" big guys right now. That is pretty interesting. The Brothers Klitschko are so good that people are actually wanting a new weight class. A new weight class = GARBAGE!!!

     
  5. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    LHW 178lbs
    HW 201lbs
    SHW 201lb +

    Good job demonstrating that you're a ****ing idiot.
     
  6. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    No, Heavyweight is the unlimited class and it should remain that way. Primo Carnera, Jess Willard, the Baers, etc. were all tall & heavy fighters and they're not considered unbeatable. Lance Whitaker, Tye Fields, Akinwande, Briggs, etc. aren't unbeatable either.
     
  7. mike_bngs

    mike_bngs Active Member Full Member

    943
    2
    Nov 8, 2008
    No, its a **** idea. Why fragment (and introduce more bloody titles) into a division that can already claim to be the sports weakest. HW's that are considered too small should get down to CW and the others deal with the fact there are alot of huge guys at HW.

    Lets not forget at other weights there are alot of guys that come in much heavier than the day of the way in.
     
  8. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Not really.

    Max Baer 6'2 205
    Buddy Baer 6'6 250

    Both brothers yet little Max was the better HW and harder puncher. Perfect example to disprove that bogus notion.
     
  9. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Not surprising to see most take the purist approach but boxers are getting bigger and bigger. You can't tell me a guy like Wlad and Vitali don't have huge advantages over a lot of HWs. This is especially a big factor if we are talking about elite HWs fighting each other and one guy is 5 inches taller and has 30 lbs on you. I mean come on. No other such advantage exists in any other weight class.

    I'm not saying we should add a super HW division but I can't just ignore these advantages either.
     
  10. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    All your examples of smaller HWs beating bigger HWs are fights between A/B level fighters vs C or lower level fighters. What happens when two A level HWs fight each other and one guy has 5 inches and 30 lbs on you? You really expect the smaller guy to overcome that?
     
  11. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    More than half the ppl on this forum beleive Ali would school Wlad and Tyson would stop inside 30 seconds.:deal
     
  12. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Well, both are ATG HWs. Ali had enough height and speed to make it a good fight and Tyson, although much smaller than Wlad, matched up well stylistically and you can't ignore Wlad's chin issues.

    These are just two specific examples of two ATG HWs.
     
  13. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    **** idea

    who are the best fighters today besides the klitschkos ?

    thats right a bunch of cruisers in haye adamek and chambers

    **** thread
     
  14. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Well, I was answering A level vs A level which essentially includes only HOFers and ATGs.:think
     
  15. red hot sheep

    red hot sheep Member Full Member

    388
    0
    Oct 16, 2010
    HW in amateurs is effectively cruiserweight.