khan vs peterson ruled as a nc ?

it will be a nc, thats for sure. I've not heard anything official.

Who would it be who calls it a no contest. The belts have obviously decided its a no contest. Is it the American Boxing association or Washington Boxing that decides?

 

I think both of them can do it.

 

how does it work with sanctioning fees when there are 3 belts on the line.

Surely that shits expensive.

 

but lets say its 10%. do you get to split that between the 3. Or do you have to pay 10% to each one individually.

I couldn't be assed with that. I'd just go for the ring title. That ones free.

 

The IBF recognise his loss as genuine.

 

As of now, it's "officially" still recognized as a loss. . . But it still MIGHT be turned to an NC - it's just that the IBF, and the DC athletic commission has not "completed their investigation yet." Peterson has not even gone through appeals and all that **** yet. . . I still have my doubts on whether the DC commission will give Khan his justice by making it a NC. . . Same with the IBF. . .


Does it really matter, though, ultimately? A few things: 1.) It should have been a W for Khan anyway. Yes, Peterson, with the testosterone level of a brahma bull was able to put up a good fight, and win 3-4 rounds. . . 2.) Peterson BY HIS OWN ADMISSION juiced up before the first fight.


I knew as soon as that damn hometown ref said: "let's throw some thundaahh" we were in for some funny business.

 

This fight is for two belts: WBA, and WBC. . . It's also for the offical lineal title, and ring title. . . It would be cool to see more belts strapped on KHan at the conclusion of Saturday night, but **** IBF, Khan gets to keep more of his money. . .

Khan will move up to WW as the undoubted, undisputed lineal champion of 140 pounds. . .

Bradley made one of the biggest ***** MOVES OF THE DECADE by ducking Khan. . . HAHAHAHA Khan punked his ass out so bad. . . Over, and over again. Now Bradley, knowing damned well Arum won't make the fight, is talking all this ****. .

 

Is that the same IBF that was found guilty of corruption?
Peterson has admitted to being on PEDs before the first fight, what's the justification for not declaring it a NC and stripping Peterson??

 

Peterson's testosterone levels were so low even Alex Ariza said that was not performance enhancing. All officials agree Peterson's mistake was not informing the officials otherwise that synthentic testosteterone did not help him.

 

That's such bull****, if the testosterone did not help him wtf was he taking it for!??

 

His levels were almost four times higher than the normal 1:1 ratio. . .

No - if he HAD INFORMED them, then he MIGHT have been allowed to continue with the taking of testosterone. . . . . He would have saved himself suspension, fines, etc. probably, as they simply wouldn't allow him to fight until he ceased, and desisted use, and was compeltely clean of the drug. . .

I somehow fail to believe that Peterson has a medical need for testosterone. . . What a coincidence that so many fighters have this need, eh?

And no, I don't care what some quack Dr. looking to make a cheap buck says in support of it. . . of course Dr. Shaw-High, and his buddies are going to defend their practice. . .