The technical skills of Ike Williams

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Manassa, Jul 13, 2012.


  1. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Just a title really. You think about it and say what you want.

    My position: Williams was a truly excellent puncher and when in full flight, one of the very best I've seen; I know I'm not exaggerating when I claim the Jack & Gatica stoppages were absolutely electric. Rightly so, his paltry knockout percentage has received negative attention, but based on video evidence and ring reports we can gather he was a 135lbs Ray Robinson when so inclined and was capable of decking world class opponents multiple times for the stoppage or even permanently affecting them with a single shot, even if he usually won on points.

    That said, I think it may be our misinterpretation that Williams was just a good boxer technically and not a great one. There isn't much footage of Williams in his mid-to-late '40s prime but of the pieces we do have, I think the second Bolanos fight is the most interesting - in that round ten he's like a refined Henry Armstrong:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGegxrxJnh4&feature=relmfu[/ame]

    Williams starts even, trading jabs, then gradually takes over the fight. He is almost Chavez-like in his performance; Bolanos was very good in his own right but despite this being called a split decision he was never that competitive. This could very well be the typical Ike Williams and slightly different to the enigmatic power puncher we normally imagine. This display is categorised by excellent jabbing and slipping abilities combined with effective stalking and a special attention for body punching; very much a long distance fighter who could hammer you on points and leave you relieved to hear the final bell.

    I'm mentioning nothing about mob involvement.
     
  2. kikibalt

    kikibalt Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,556
    20
    Aug 30, 2011
    Williams was a very good, I would go as far as saying "classic" boxer/puncher. Underrated boxing skills imo.....Btw I seen all three of his fights with Bolanos live. When I was ten years old my dad took me to see my first live boxing, that being the 1946 fight between Williams & Bolanos.
     
  3. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Do you realise how valuable you are? Please describe the other two fights!
     
  4. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,275
    1,745
    Sep 9, 2011
    not the greatest footwork or defence of jabs/staights imo, but that's picking small holes in a great offensive fighter
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    No I think that is quite fair. I do think Williams took a few unnecessary jabs at times but he seemed not to mind or even carried an indifference or disdain for these punches, particularly from a weak opponent.
     
  6. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    399
    Jan 22, 2010
    I saw Ike in his prime at 135 pounds several times ,in NY and Philly, koing Beau Jack...
    He was at his best at 135 pounds, and was just a shade under the WW Ray Robinson in all around ability...Ike had troubles with the powerful Manager's Guild, and was blackballed from lucrative bouts for awhile...But when he was "allowed ", Ike Williams would be a handful for any lightweight who ever lived...
     
  7. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    beautiful left hook and came from that era, namely the late 40s which was rich with talent
     
  8. kikibalt

    kikibalt Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,556
    20
    Aug 30, 2011
  9. ashl3y72

    ashl3y72 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,135
    54
    Jul 4, 2012
    The left hook right hand combo he threw may have been one of the most devastating at the weight. ouch
     
  10. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
  11. kikibalt

    kikibalt Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,556
    20
    Aug 30, 2011
    Thanks Manassa :good
     
  12. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Frank, can you explain Williams' low knockout percentage? I've always put it down to a combination of things, such as:

    - He was measured and more technical than we think and didn't necessarily concentrate on looking for a knockout
    - He fought in an era of tough/slick fighters
    - Certain fights may have been 'tampered with'
    - He was afraid to look good in fear of being avoided

    Quite clearly, it wasn't because Williams couldn't punch.
     
  13. kikibalt

    kikibalt Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,556
    20
    Aug 30, 2011
    "He was measured and more technical than we think and didn't necessarily concentrate on looking for a knockout"

    "He fought in an era of tough/slick fighters"

    These two will work best for me...The 3th would also work....I don't think he was afraid to look good.

    He really was not a fighter going out with KO on his mind, if the KO came it came. He was a guy that used all his skills to win a fight.
     
  14. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,511
    4,925
    Aug 19, 2010
    I posted on YT a while ago.....
    Williams vs Minelli.....

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ciq-Zc8qKk[/ame]
     
  15. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Yeah I saw that when you first posted it, forgot to express my gratitude. This, and Bolanos II, allow us to accurately gauge how Williams performed over several rounds against two excellent fighters. He doesn't disappoint.

    Thanks again.