the top ten HW ATG list consists of 1. Wlad 2. Vitali Lewis - denied a rematch to someone who's face he already amputated Ali - too small Tyson - too small Louis - too small Marciano - too small Holmes - too small Frazier - too small Foreman - too small This begs the question, who does get into the Klit-tards top ten considering they disregard everyone from boxing history on the basis that they're too small or refused to smack the **** out of Vitali (again)?
Iam a Klitschko fan one of the biggest on this site but iam no fan boy. Anyone who doesnt think Ali, Young George Foreman, Homes, or Lewis are above both are crazy period.
This message is hidden because Nosbor is on your ignore list. I wouldn't bother, you're one of the biggest ****s on this site.
Yes for some reason Tyson,Ali and Foreman who were all bigger and heavier than David Haye/Mormeck are deemed too small to fight a Klitschko. Ali was a real 6'3 and 214 pounds. Foreman was taller than Ali so I say about 6'4 and 220-275 pounds! Tyson was 5'10 217-225
And Joe Louis KO'd guys as big as Klitschko brothers as did Marciano. So **** off Klitschko fans or else be fair.
So under today rules were a 195 or 200 pound Joe Louis ko's a 6'6-250 hw who bigger, stronger and quicker then any fighter he's every faced or little Marciano who was about wht 5 10 190 thats bs. no way and Lennox kills era was well, well so does Bowe from the first Holyfield fight
You can **** right off! NOSBOR is one of the better posters here. . Haha and he has an awesome avi picture! This certainly isn't my HW ATG list. . . and im a klittard. I was just discussing this yesterday, and earlier today: I have Wladimir around 23ish . . . BUT, I think he has the potential to crack top 15-12 if he fights for another 4-5 years, winning every fight, and breaking Louis' record for defenses. . . I mean, ****, 70-3(60+ ko's)? IN THE MODERN ERA for a HW to have 70 wins? With 60+ KO's? I don't care how weak the era was (hwich really isn't as much weaker as parts of other HW's champions era was). . .