Bert Kenny dropped Jack Demspey twice?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 18, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,994
    Mar 21, 2007
    Bert Kenny was a wild-man of the ring and a fan favourite according to Clay Moyle, writing in his new book on Billy Miske, due to his trying, brutal, punching style. He was a professional loser really but Boxrec does have him taking a NWS over Jack Sullivan in 1914 (I could see it in weird way).

    But he lost to the names he fought, almost exclusively.

    Dempsey met him in 1916 and their fight was a hum-dinger, Dempsey claimign he was paid $14 but that he "could have sold the blood [he lost in the fight] for fourteen dollers."

    He also claims that he was "bounced off the canvas a couple of times" by Kenny. Boxrec only carries the two KD's inflicted on Kenny in this fight.

    I thought it was an interesting remark. They sound like flashes.

    This was three years before Dempsey came to the title and I suspect his style had a pretty serious overhaul in the interim.



    http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=39995&cat=boxer
     
  2. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,875
    2,353
    Jul 11, 2005
    New York Evening Telegram:
    Although "Jack" Dempsey, the light heavyweight who came here from Salt Lake City with a record of twenty-seven knockouts to his credit, failed to put away "Wild Bert" Kenny last night in the main bout of ten rounds at the Fairmont A.C., in the Bronx, he handed him a terrible beating.

    The bell came to Kenny's rescue several times during the contest and in the final session Dempsey scored knockdowns three times with short left hooks to the jaw. In the second round Kenny went to the canvas and again in the fourth he was taking a count when the bell rang.


    NY Sun:
    Wild Jack Dempsey subdued Wild Bert Kenney in fast ten round affair.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,994
    Mar 21, 2007
    Niiice.

    This reads like a total one-sided thrashing. I wonder i Dempsey a bit misty-eyed over this fight? If he lost $14 worth of blood, it's not something the Telegram reporter noticed.
     
  4. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    238
    Feb 19, 2012
    Probably Dempsey was fighting so damn often, he got his fights mixed up. And you're right that his style must have changed. When Arcel saw him in 1916, he said "He looked like anything but a great fighter... a saloon brawler." So he changed something.
     
  5. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    It's impossible to know for sure.

    I suspect Dempsey was a bit self-deprecating when it came to how well he did in some of those fights. He remembered how tough the fights were and credited his opponents with doing more than they actually had, perhaps. He similarly protested the reporters who had him shading or winning the J L Johnson fight. Dempsey insisted he'd been on the wrong end of a thrashing.
     
  6. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,875
    2,353
    Jul 11, 2005
    He was twisting and exaggerating to make his past look harder than it really was. Both about the supposed beatings he received, and how little money he supposedly got.
     
  7. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Do you know how much money he really got ?
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,994
    Mar 21, 2007
    Also nice.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,994
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think so too. It's strange how this attitude helped to form one of the pillars of the Dempsey legend and I wonder if he just knew this, learned it or if that was just his character.

    Though Clay obviously reported an interesting quote in good faith...and maybe Jack did get dropped, it's certainly far from impossible that a pair of total flashes in a messy fight could have gone unreported, even if i wouldn't bet on it.
     
  10. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    238
    Feb 19, 2012
    And also, no neutral corner rule. If they were flashes Dempsey might have popped back up before a count even started. It soups be easy to miss.

    Or, you know, Dempsey could just have been mythologizing himself...
     
  11. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,875
    2,353
    Jul 11, 2005
    I don't know, but in earlier version of the same story (not in his book, but in a series of articles from 1921), he said he got $43 for the bout with Kenny, only $14 in autobio book. 1921's $16 for the bout with Anderson turned into $9 in the book, $100 turned into $35 for Johnson, together with three broken ribs instead of one, etc.

    According to Harry Downing's recollections, when Dempsey fought an amateur bout for him in 1914, he got $2.50. Gradually his part was increasing after that, even though they were only 4-rounders, $5, $7.50, $10, $15, $25. Dempsey got $500 for a bout with Gilbert in October 1916 (at Salt Lake City). Next bout, in Salida, of all places, he got $250 cash, of which he gave his mother $100.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,994
    Mar 21, 2007
    The full breakdown of the pay according to Dempsey via Moyle is $30 - $2 went to the towel man, and fourteen each for Dempsey and his manager.


    Further to this, Miske-Dempsey I sounds like an absolute beauty of a fight and there is no question that this one was anything but one-sided - but on the other hand, Dempsey wins according to most of the newspapers quoted (Miske did get the nod from one, and a couple had draws). But Dempsey himself muddies the water, saying he wouldn't have won were it not for his (amazing sounding) rally in the 7th, which seems not to have been the case - Miske grabbed two rounds.

    He is also said to have said that if he had to fight guys as tough as Miske on the way to the title he would rather not do it as "they ask to high a premium" and gifts Miske some sort of moral victory for remaining upright.

    Dempsey also seems to have gone into the bout regarding Brennan higher than Miske and emerged from it with the opposite view.
     
  13. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    :good

    I'm not sure it's exactly stuff we would expect him to remember, to be fair.
    I guess the details aren't as important as the moral of the story : It was hard work and the pay wasn't great.
     
  14. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Impossible to say, but either way I find it more palatable that the guys who go in the opposite direction.



    I agree.
    It's almost like the Johnson-Langford story (although, I think one reporter did see Johnson "slip" at one point ?).

    On the other hand, I saw Mike Tyson recollecting the first Frank Bruno fight in a recent (last 5 years) interview and he said, "I had him down, he had me down, it was a great fight" or words to that effect.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,994
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's quite endearing actually.