Ricardo Lopez , do u consider him 1 of d top 10 greatest Mexicans of all times ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by frankenfrank, Jul 17, 2012.


  1. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Not sure I'd put him above the non-dominant variety Mexican with vastly superior resume (i.e. Jose Medel, Baby Arizmendi, Kid Azteca, Rafael Herrera, Chucho Castillo etc.)

    But I think somewhere in the 10 to 20 range is fair given his obvious skill level, consistency and longevity.
     
  2. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Saldivar @ #4 ? D guy was KOd by 37 years old former bantamweight Jofre , got stopped by Sibata , floored by Jose Legra whom wasn't a puncher . He had good wins but they get offset enough by his 2 embarrassing losses and d KD . Still he deserves a higher ranking than Ricardo Lopez , because Saldivar beat good opponents . But does he deserve a higher ranking than d 14 i listed ? no . Olivares ahead of Sanchez is really bad . Suppose that Sanchez fought Arguello and Chavez and gotten stopped by both , which is quite disrespectful 2 him because d supposedly inferior LaPorte did well against Chavez and d really inferior Lockridge did well against Chavez , not 2 mention d guys who beat and sometimes stopped Arguello , such 2 losses would still have been more Xcusable than Olivares' losses 2 Herera*2 and Castillo*3 (i know it's only *1 on paper and due 2 cuts , but Castillo still floored Olivares 1-0 in each 1 of Castillo's "losing efforts")
    Also both Castillo and Herera were older than Olivares which makes their wins over him count big and also makes their worse per4mances against Rudolfo Martinez & Bobby Chacon Xcusable .
    1 can speculate that if Sanchez lived on 2 fight on he would have gotten stopped at n even younger age than Olivares' stoppage loss , but Olivares did not achieve nearly as much by d young age Sanchez achieved what he had .
    How can Olivares b ranked above Sanchez ? and Saldivar over Morales and all d men i listed really , especially Ramirez whose opposition was at d very least 1 of d 5 toughest out of all d men listed .
    U don't have Ramirez in your top 10 . He stopped Rosario , deserved 2 win against Arguello , did not deserve 2 lose in his 1st fight against Rosario .
    U can erase at least 2 losses off his record and turn 1 in2 win .
    Lost 2 Chavez on a technicality . i know Chavez handled him well up 2 that point , but maybe he was just about 2 get gassed and that was his way out as a "winner" ? Rosario handled Ramirez great in their rematch until it all flipped .
    Azteca and Arizmendi ? 4 what ?

    Look @ who Melchor Cob Castro fought and how it ended :
    Rolando Pascua , Humberto Gonzalez*2 , Michael Carbajal .
    Did not get stopped by either of these guys and stopped Pascua .
    Actually Castro was d clear #2 of a strong division just behind Carbajal .
    He was 5' as opposed 2 Lopez' 5'5" and a lightfly until d age of 35 all suggesting hat he was not a big 1 . Was Lopez smaller than he ? would Lopez do as well against Castro's opposition ? he would've been crushed by it .
    What reason is there 2 rank a 5'5" 105 lber who fought no1 over a 5' 108lber who fought every1 and until wasn't stopped up 2d age of 36 ?
    Castro was better both h2h and p4p .
    After this can u still think Arizmendi/Azteca/RLopez / Saldivar were any better than Castro or Ramirez ? u don't even have Castro & Ramirez in your top 15 ??

    And my list is joke ?

    What did RLopez achieve in order 2 get n all times top 15 ranking of his country ? and Arizmendi/Azteca ? so wins count but losses don't ?
     
  3. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    which were tested and proven against who ?
    slightly even worse than RJJ . RJJ fought undersized corpses whom at least knew how 2 fight and were Xperienced . Even if still still undersized corpses whom he could enjoy speed & power advantages over .

    Ricardo Lopez' opponents did not even have any Xperience and never amounted 2 anything past or prior .

    I can look great shadowboxing 2 .
    Maybe u start ranking me higher .
    Give me n undersized dead man and i'll beat his s . not dead ? no fite ! :yep:deal
     
  4. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    Saldivar was past his best when he lost to Shibata, and was also past his best when he BEAT Legra and dont forget that he was shot to **** when he lost to Jofre...You can also argue that he has the best resume of all Mexican boxers. He cleared out one of THE most deepest Featherweight divisions ever. Saldivar is far greater than guys like Castro and Ramirez, there is absolutly no doubt about that. However, Sanchez, Olivares, and Saldivar are all interchangable IMO..Them along with Chavez and Canto are a lock for top 5.


    What did Azteca, Arizmendi, and Casanova do?

    Victories over Cocoa Kid and Ceferino Garcia (Azteca)
    Victories over Henry ****in' Armstrong (Arizmendi)
    Victories over the two Mexican greats mentioned above as well as another great Mexican in Juan Zurita (Casanova)

    And you want to compare Ramirez' and Castro's accomplishments to these guys'? :rofl:rofl:rofl

    Edit: Now that i mention Zurita, i think i would put him in 15th instead of Finito. And Chavez about to gas out against Ramirez??? :lol::lol::rofl:rofl:patsch

    Chavez was clearly going easy on him (the two of them were very good friends) and was still able to put on a clinic on him.
     
  5. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    what i guessed , wins count and losses don't .
    typical .
    Think about it : Ramirez beat : Rosario , Arguello , Whitaker .

    And Saldivar had d deepset resume ?
    more than Chavez' ? more than Sanchez ? more than Ramirez ? more than Marquez ? not .
    Also he was 7 years younger than Jofre when Jofre KOd him . So saldivar was shot 2 **** but Jofre was young & fresh ?

    Your comments about Cob Castro compared 2 Ricardo Lopez?

    I give him credit 4 being consistent at beating bums . It means something . But in d case of his country , that something is less than what every other name mentioned here so far should b given credit 4 . Saldivar was good , but not enough 2 make my top 16 Mexicans . Maybe top 20 . Being shot 2 **** @ age 29 means something i guess , and that thing is not good .
     
  6. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    20
    Dec 12, 2009

    Wins over the guys i mentioned eclipse anything Ramirez and Castro ever accomplished, regardless of who they have lost to.
     
  7. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    hard 4 me 2 reply on this
     
  8. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    20
    Dec 12, 2009

    You just killed your entire argument the instant you listed Whitaker as a Ramirez win.

    No need arguing with you anymore.
     
  9. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,153
    Oct 22, 2006
    Very much so:

    10 Erik Morales
    9 Vicente Saldivar
    8 Lupe Pintor
    7 Salvador Sanchez
    6 Marco Antonio Barrera
    5 Jose Napoles (Adopted Mexico as his own country; Cuban by birth)
    4 Ricardo Lopez
    3 Ruben Olivares
    2 Carlos Zarate
    1 Julio Cesar Chavez

    Mentions to: Humberto Gonzales, Miguel Canto, Rodolfo Martinez, Alfonso Zamora, Daniel Zaragoza, Joe Rivers, Baby Arizmendi, Chalky Wright, Manuel Medina, Rafael Limon, Jose Luis Ramirez and Jose Luis Castillo.
     
  10. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,794
    8,332
    Feb 11, 2005
    10th position is probably about as high as you could rate him. 15 or below is being unfair.

    He doesn't have a truly stellar name on his resume, but he's got one very good one in El Bufalo, Rosendo Alvarez, one pretty good one in Saman Sor Jatourong, and a number of decent ones who could have been good had they not run into Finito.
     
  11. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    now i c he has a few paper titlists on his resume . supposing they weren't bums , it seems 2 me like Lopez caought them @ d right time of difficulty of making d weight .

    I'm still absolutely convinced that he avoided Melchor Cob Castro & Michael Carbajal and would have fared much worse against their respective lists of opponents . Ricardo Lopez was n Xtremely protected fighters . His management managed 2 fool not only d Mexican "fans" but also d current "historians" . They knew that he should b kept away from any quality fighter . And quality is not measured in how a man looks when he beats bums or drained paper titlists .
     
  12. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Well, he showed that he could match it with a decent bigger opponent when he was past his best, that at least shows that he was at a high level when better off himself.

    I agree his resume is massively shite on the whole and looking good against sub standard opposition isn't necessarily the hardest thing to do, but there is some substance there. I don't think he was a fraud with a padded record. He was a great little text-book fighter - with a padded record.
     
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    You can't talk down Vicente Saldivar for embarrassing losses and then talk up Jose Luis Ramirez in the same breath.

    I mean, we're talking about a guy that got Ko'ed by a drunken, semi-retired bantamweight and got shut out by Ray Mancini.

    Fair play to Ramirez though, he deserved 2 wins against Rosario, beat Arguello imo and gave Whitaker his toughest lightweight fight (no way he won though unless your scoring criteria is who walked forward more).

    A very good fighter that would have Ko'ed Castillo, Corrales, Bazan and probably Stevie Johnston too. But then he'd probably go and do some embarassing **** like get shut out by Acelino Freitas.
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Top 8 for me. Lopez not only retired un-defeated, he had rare power for his size, and excellent technical skill.
     
  15. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Vicente Saldivar had 2 humiliating losses both @ age that still counts and while he was Xperienced . Can u make Xcuses 4 him ? Ramirez had 1 if at all .
    Ramirez' "body punch KO" loss is questioned because no1 here knows about it if :
    1) was he drained 2 a catchweight ?
    2) suppose it was not a catchweight , maybe he couldn't effectively make d weight anymore , weight not listed .
    3) was it a low blow ? or something else ?
    4) maybe he had another problem / endured other cheating . U don't know .

    aside from it being n obscure fight and questioned , it was Ramirez' 1st fight against quality opponent , not that this alone will make it not count .

    Whitaker won based on what ?
    coming backwards ?
    did he land any more punches than Ramirez had in that fight ?
    if he had , was it 2 (somehow) scored grazing jabs during d entire "fight" 2 Ramirez' 1 ?

    maybe , but getting "shut out" is much better than getting knocked out .
    I can bear ranking Juan Manuel Marquez , Erik Morales , Melchor Cob Castro , Jose Luis Lopez above Ramirez .
    Maybe someday i will b able 2 bare ranking Chucho Castillo , Rafael Herera and Olivares ahead of him , if that "loss 2 a drunked bantamweight" will b legitimized .

    But there is no way that Saldivar or Ricardo Lopez rank ahead of Ramirez .