Seeing how an already extremely strong and very fit fighter seemed to improve drastically physically between these two fights I can't really shake that suspicion. Anyone feel the same, and has there at anytime been something concrete to it?
That's true. He was huge at MW. Must have cost to get down in weight. Eubank was arguably more suited for SMW too, though. So it should even itself out to a degree.
I don't think it was that Watson was necessarily stronger, he beat up Eubank because he was a better technician with a better defence Watson should have got the decision in the first fight. He decided he wasn't getting a decision if he didn't box aggressively in the rematch, hence he came forward to hammer Eubank silly
He seemed to still be improving as a ring-general and fighter, thus fought at a higher pace that took advantage of Eubank's relatively poor stamina. Had Eubank ever actually been able to go a steady, hard fought 12 with an equally talented opponent without needing to take rounds off and dictate pace, it would probably have been another controversial razor-thin fight.
Have only watched either fight once, but I just remember both his workrate and physical dominance as being much improved in the rematch. Anyhow, if not for that devastating punch, what do you think that Watson could have gone on to do? In the form he was in that night (whether PEDs had anything to do with it or not), would you make any SMW at the time a favourite over him?
Well McCallum would still beat him but it'd be closer with him being stronger at 168 and more experienced, McCallum ofcourse stuck to 160. Him against Toney and Nunn are interesting fights, I'm not sure where I stand on them. He'd beat Benn again, Rochiagiani (don't let Bodhi see), Malinga Faded smaller types in Kalambay and Bomber GRaham are other interesting contests. I think both are better prime for prime but both are smaller and faded By '94 I'd pick him to give Jones a few problems and winning a few rounds before being broken down and I think he does better against Jones than most. Him against McClellan, I think he could pull off the win because he has the tighter defence and maybe able to outjab and counter McClellan Good interesting fights
McCallum would get beat any time after the first Toney fight imo. Especially if he was giving up or going up in weight.He'd still have his moments, but he was too sluggish by then not to get outworked.Would still have his moments and take rounds with some finesse of course, but there was less snap and authority in his punches than the weight drained Kalule by that point. Beats everyone but Toney and Jones at 168 imo.
Watched the two fights again, and the difference was in tactics, nothing else. Take back my allegations of possible PEDs - it was just about Watson taking Eubank out of his comfort zone from the start in the rematch. By doing that he forced Eubank to punch when he really didn't want to, but had to in order to keep Watson off, and that made it easier for Watson to counter and find openings to the body. Ironically, he had to fight like a swarmer to get the most out of his abilities as a counter puncher. That was possible against Eubank, who had a tendency to get sloppy when not getting to pick and choose when to engage. Ps. I scored the first fight for Watson this time around as well. Had him winning by 1 or 2 points. There were quite many close rounds, though, so a draw would not be unreasonable either. Eubank winning was hardly a scandal seing how close it was, but somewhat of a stretch in my opinion.
I'd say after the rematch, but agree in general. Would give Watson a decent chance of outworking Toney to a decision.
I've seen a few Eubank fights and have been mystified by why opponents allow him to take timeout whenever he wanted. He'd throw two punches, step back, pose, change position, pose again, turn and do a mock clap, step over and pose again ... and it's like the other guy is reading the morning paper waiting for Chris to say, "OK, I'm ready to box again." Eubank had skill, no doubt, and above-average (but not frightening) power. But mostly he was a bull**** artist who fought a lot of guys who were more than willing to let him get away with draining the clock and fighting for a minute or less per round. And a lot of his close decisions would have gone the other way if he didn't limit his fights to safe turf with friendly home judges.
He was paying a backhanded compliment. He had also been praising his strength. He had no idea Watson was in trouble either. This fight ended Chris as a puncher, the only knock outs he scored after this were single shots. If he hurt someone like Thompson or Collins he went straight to a pose.