Carl Froch bases his conditioning on 10 years worth of training records!

Every athlete should have training records, I'd be very surprised to find someone who didn't. Also Dirrell beat Froch, he outboxed him and Froch resorted to rabbit punches and throwing Dirrell on the ground because he was frustrated. At a neutral venue I'm sure Dirrell would leave no doubt as to who is the better fighter.

 

:deal Dirrell clearly beat Froch. It was a robbery.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1hHNbHGegQ[/ame]

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY[/ame]

LMFAO at "now, maybe the real fight begins"

ROFL, not if Drivel has anything to do with it

 

You people talk like it was Pernell Whitaker-Jose Luis Ramirez or something.

Yes, Dirrell could have had the fight scored for him, but there was nothing decisive about that performance. Too much holding, falling, complaining. Froch's style is unorthodox so sometimes he doesn't look as if he is being effective but he too was landing.

And that video's bollocks. It shows nothing from the first 6 rounds which is worrying? The last five minutes is spent on the judges scorecards being announced...

Point is, there is a difference between being "robbed" and coming out on the unlucky side of an indecisive fight.

 

Eddie Hearn was talking about this in regards to Kell Brook, saying that Brook needs to take a look at Froch and how he records his weight after every single run he has. Froch maximises every last bit of talent he has and Brook needs to follow that same path.

 

There is a part 1 too you plank.atschatsch I only posted part 2.

I wanted Froch to win, but he lost and got a gift. He was beaten to the punch time and time again. I watched the fight with my brother, and we were both cheering Froch on, but we are not blind and we know how to score a fight.:deal

Are you from Nottingham by any chance? :rofl

 

I was born in Nottingham, but I'm objective when it comes to boxing.

I'm not saying Froch clearly won, but neither did Dirrell. As I say, it was pretty indecisive.

My opinion on this one is that people see Dirrell's more traditional style, his athleticism, and immediately think he is doing the better work, when often times that was not the case in this fight.

Its a never-ending debate, some think Dirrell, some think Froch. The fact is it was a close fight and it was scored as such. Froch got the decision for two judges and Dirrell for the other. No robbery here. Nothing to argue about.

 

:rofl:rofl:roflatsch

 

who cares about Andre Drivel anyway?

the guy is a glass hearted coward

 

Funnily enough, I didn't spend long there, so don't have a real affinity with the place.

But like I say, I'm honest.

If you and your brother are so good at scoring "robberies" why don't you do the sport a service and make it your profession? Boxing could do with some good young judges I'd imagine.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

way to ruin a thread

 

Haters ALWAYS try to support their own agenda with bull****. 2 judges to 1 is not a robbery, its a split decision, and internet warriors opinions are worth ****.

Particularly when they come out with garbage such as branding a guy that has had 7 fights in the last 3 years, 2 of which were in his home town, 3 in America, 1 in Denmark, and 1 in Finland, " an over rated hometown fighter "

That says far more about the level of idiocy of the poster, than it does about the fighter.

 

I like Froch. The guy is good for boxing, wish we had more of his calibre.

 

Constructive! With every emoticon you ruin your own integrity.

Have fun on here :good