Adam Booth admitted they ducked Vitali to fight G-sora

The irrelevancy of your post had to do with the point you tried to make, which no one denied.

Haye declined the offer Vitali made him. That's a fact.

Haye's counter-offer was subsequently declined by Vitali. Also a fact.

Maybe you aren't arguing the double-standard, plenty of others are though.

 

Haye declined the offer Vitali made him to fight him first.

Simple. That's a rejection of the formal terms.

 

:thumbsup

 

K2: "Here's a deal to fight in September."

Haye: "Cool. Sounds good. I'll take a warm up in July then we'll fight in September"

K2: "No deal. We'll fight Charrr"

 

The jealousy of Haye continues.

 

How can the point be irrelevant if it clearly contradicted your so called facts? Haye never declined the offer, he negotiated a clause in the contract to fight Chisora first. At no point did Haye say, No i wont fight you in September. Thats fact.

Your post was misleading to people and you know it.

'Maybe you aren't arguing the double-standard, plenty of others are though.'
I clearly wasnt and you have nothing to suggest otherwise, yet you cannot allow yourself to be wrong it seems?

 

you really think David Haye would have fought Chisora in July and Vitali in September?...Seems like bull**** to me. David Haye is a part time boxer and a attention seeking marketing guru. No reason for Klitschko to trust his words, especially after all the fake injuries and the smokescreens he is known for. Haye could have easily injured himself against Chisora and the September date would have been cancelled. Hence no paycheck for Vitali and bunch of money for Haye after the Chisora fight. This is purely business, all this emotional crap about defending your honor is just some jizz to get the public wired. You saw how Chisora and Haye were hugging after the fight. Haye is just using everything he has to get some more dollar, and Vitali has the same right. That´s why he´s not doing Haye any favors and is fighting Charr. The champion fights on his own terms and he is going to pick the date not vice versa.

 

Sure, I can, pal. I'm often wrong.

This, however is simple.

The formal terms of the offer were not accepted by Haye. Hence, he declines Vitali's offer.

Sure, Haye's counter-offer was subsequently declined by Vitali too.

If you really want to call it misleading, go ahead. The matter is rather transparent though, there's nothing to be ambiguous about.

 

I agree with you and have already alluded to this very critical point.

Some would rather remain ignorant for whatever reason.

 

To your points.

1. Agreed- there is no dispute about this, however this discussion is about HW not CW.
2. He beat some big useless cretin that had kept his title by a combination of ducking the Klitschko's and some dodgy officiating (he should have lost atleast twice prior to Haye).
3. Disagree- I would not call Haye's performance against Wlad as "Fighting". I would call it running and trying to steal a decision by avoiding any kind of "Fighting". Have it your way though, if it makes you feel better.
4. Been in exciting fights throughout his career- I dont disagree here at all. He knows how to finish a hopeless outmatched opponent in spectacular style.
5. Disagree- Murray will never win a slam.

 

Yep, spot on. Sounds about right.

 

:good

We think alike.

 

yup!

 

Promotion for the Charr fight didn't start until after Haye - Chisora - no reason why it could not be arranged for Charr to step in if Haye lost or was injured.

 

Amir Khan - yeah he's knocking 'em out :happy