More Skilled: Eder Jofre or Julio Cesar Chavez ??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vic-JofreBRASIL, Jul 24, 2012.


  1. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,520
    4,934
    Aug 19, 2010
    I rate Julio´s skills really high.....
    IMHO he was one of the 15 more skilled fighters ever, and his combinations are up there with anyone, even Robinson or Duran for example, easily imo....very complete in my view too....could box pretty well he he wanted....

    So...how do you see this comparison ? Jofre and Chavez....who was more skilled ??

    :bbb
     
  2. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    ****... Chavez was.a better in fighter, better body puncher, and might have punched better in combination. Jofre had a superb jab, better defense, and footwork. I think Chavez controlled the distance and pace of the fighter better, but i'm not to confident on that one. Jofre had a much better second act but took off time in the middle, so i'm not sure that's indicative of skills or not. Jofre set traps better and had a slightly higher boxing IQ. I'll go Jofre but only because I think he would better sans his physical gifts.
     
  3. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Chavez was the consistently tidier of the two as a puncher, but i think Jofre was more skilled overall.

    Chavez had slightly more of an attainable workmanlike feel to his technical work than Jofre imo.Eder changed punching style and offensive approach more freely.Had more finesse throughout the totality of his career(though perhaps helped by the smaller amoung of footage on his later fights here)where Chavez became more of an precise but somewhat tactically rigid seek and destroy fighter from the late 80s on, Jofre seemed to remain more the complete boxer-puncher.

    Some good points by littleRed there as well
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,542
    Jul 28, 2004
    Hands down it was Eder Jofre.
     
  5. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    1,372
    21
    Jul 13, 2012
    Cool match up. Chavez skills can be overlooked because of his usual strategy, but, beside his great punching coordination, if you consider how economically he worked to grind his man down, he had to be very precise to be as efficient as he was. But on overall skills, I gotta stick with Éder. He was better defensively, had better footwork, knew how to position himself to better work the angles, and, while he wasn't as good as Chavez as a combination puncher, he knew how to place his punches and how to distribute them efficiently. Éder for the same reason he usually is praised for: completeness.
     
  6. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,316
    12,601
    Mar 2, 2006
    Jofre. He could box, punch and had an analytical head on his shoulders. No style was going to confuse him. Chavez was great when the fighter was in front of him, but when Whitaker offered angles he hadn't a clue what to do. And went round after round with no plan B. His corner too was at fault for not instructing or possibly he was unable to execute. But to answer the question again, Jofre.
     
  7. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Well, Jofre was probably lucky he never encountered a Whitaker in his career, because he probably would have been rendered just as clueless.

    He had his hands full with Herman Marques, a Vilomar Fernandez type who gave Jofre a boxing lesson for 10 rounds before Jofre landed the boom and brought proceedings to a close.

    Chavez did ok against mediocre movers like Camacho, Smith, R. Mayweather (as he fought in the rematch), it was only when he faced a great mover that he was given problems.

    I suspect Jofre would have been the same.

    As to the thread question, I actually don't think Jofre has better defense than Chavez, but he does have better footwork and imo better punch variety, especially with jabs and looping hooks which although unseemly, were pretty precise and effective over the course of a fight.
     
  8. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    I'd agree that Jofre was more complete, more versatile, but Chavez perfected his style. His footwork wasn't any less than what he needed, he could cut the ring off as well as anyone. His defense was excellent, enough to get in close without taking too much damage (and he could more than handle what he would take), and his ability to split the guard was uncanny. He was surgical in his combination punching, unbelievably precise. He shouldn't be slighted here for failing against Whitaker - Pea was beyond special - and I'm confident that SS is right when he says Jofre likely comes undone much the same way if he had ever ran into a Whitaker of his own.

    Chavez was as flawless a pressure fighter as there's been. Being more complete is nice and all, but I don't think it necessarily makes Jofre the greater skilled fighter. In other words, maybe Jofre had more skills at his disposal, but Chavez was better at his. It's a very good comparison.
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Venice Bus Station.
     
  10. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Flea I think you misspelled Ricardo Lopez.
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    :|
     
  12. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    How is his last name pronounced?
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Boar-Core-Saw using actual words ;-)
     
  14. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012