Carl Froch wants Pavlik in November?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bad Boyz, Jul 25, 2012.


  1. Natural1

    Natural1 Guest

    I think it's a good fight. I've heard both Pavlik, and more recently, that South AFrican kid, Oosthuzien being mentioned for Froch in November. Both are great fights.

    I still haven't heard anything from Pavlik, or Top Rank on this fight since Froch has said he wants Pavlik.
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Good tune up for Froch great oppurtunity for Pavlik ..
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I'm down, lets throw some thundah, baby!
     
  4. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Watch, listen, and learn.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFGQHC3Jopg[/ame]
    ;;;
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InpBtqDNIBU[/ame]
     
  5. JN43

    JN43 Guest

    Pavlik wont travel. Doesnt have that do or die warrior attitude.
     
  6. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,987
    2
    Jul 24, 2011
    I know who he doesnt want to fight, Dirrell
     
  7. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
  8. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Love Pavlik but he needs to retire , I know he has had problems outside of the ring and is an accident waiting to happen.

    Froch would destroy him.
     
  9. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    What are you talking about he went from Ohio to Oxnard ..
     
  10. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
  11. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    Why would he?

    1. He would have to leave Nottingham, where he is filling arenas to fight in front of hardly anyone in whatever place Dirrell (the challenger) says.
    2. No one wants to see this fight, not even Dirrell cheerleaders, the first one wasn't good.
    3. He already beat Dirrell, no need to try and get revenge.
    4. He is 35, he deserves to be able to go and make as much money as possible, Dirrell isn't worthwhile.
    5. Dirrell has done absolutely **** all since losing to Froch.

    Five perfectly good reasons not to fight him, people supply a reason apart from 'Their first fight was close/Dirrell was robbed' because that isn't enough for a rematch.
     
  12. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
  13. Philly-Tough

    Philly-Tough Active Member Full Member

    1,060
    0
    May 7, 2012
    Agreed 100%. If not this Froch vs Bika would interest me.
     
  14. Froch would brutally murder pavlik

    Homicide via fists