Valuev beat Haye

He absolutely didn't lol. It's absolutely baffling to me how anyone can have this fight any closer than 116-112 Haye. Valuev DIDN'T LAND A SINGLE MEANINGFUL PUNCH in 12 rounds only to get wobbled by a single shot in the last round.

Two of the three judges were spot-on.

 

Haye was so convinced he won he needed a post fight excuse as to why he fought like a complete *****.

Biggest ***** in boxing time and time again.

 

that one shot was the only one worth showing in the highlights, no doubt you had Haye winning 118-110 or higher, but you must be an awesome scorer considering many people have problems scoring a fight when both fighters throw 8 punches a round

 

I love it when someone on an online forum, who posts just as much as you (mostly just provoking arguments with strangers) acts as if they are somehow superior to you.

The irony of you and your nobhead mate coming out with this is great.

 

There are four official scoring criteria (I won't post them, look them up yourself) and Valuev wasn't close to winning a single one. I watched the fight twice (once live and once on youtube) and had Haye easily winning. Four rounds were the best I could fathom scoring for Valuev solely due to Haye throwing close to nothing. Valuev threw fairly consistently but had an accuracy worse than Adamek v Chambers. You can't win a fight that way, can you?

 

then why did so many people have it a close fight? I had it a draw first time I watched it, didn't bother the second time because I didn't want to risk falling asleep, it was a close fight, I believe Haye could have done much better, but he feared to engage against a guy who had back problems coming into the fight and who Haye could of circled twice in the same time it took him to throw a punch

 

I dont post as much as you.

My posts are short sweet and to the point.

You write poems for ****s sake....poemsatsch

 

Wlad is hilarious :bart

 

If you add all the posts from Awesome's Klittard alts. It goes up to around there as well though.

Let's not forget Vladimir23 no longer post (For some reason)

 

I rate Haye, but I thought it was Valuev's decision. He didn't deserve to take the man's belt.

 

Because too many people don't know how to score a fight. Haye's activity was low (probably one of the lowest ever recorded) but his accuracy was fine. Valuev threw a lot, didn't hit ****. It's that simple really. You can't win a fight on aggression alone, get over it.
Or can you genuinely come up with 6 or more rounds in which Valuev was superior by these criteria?

1. Clean Punching
2. Effective Aggressiveness
3. Ring Generalship
4. Defense

 

LOL CAN YOU>>>

 

wat?

 

Your posts are a continual attempt to draw people into an argument.

Don't act like you're some ****ing Fonz of the forum.

 

:rofl