Floyd Mayweather, Jr v Pernell Whitaker

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Aug 1, 2012.

  1. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    9
    Great post
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    269
    It would be ridiculously close imo, Whitaker has better jab, movement and radar. Floyd has quicker hands, is longer/taller and is stronger. I'd lean towards Whitaker with no great confidence
     
  3. FIN

    FIN Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    1
    Very close fight,i think Sweet Pea is just better all around,Sweet Pea wins a close decision,maybe 7 rounds to 5..
     
  4. MrBumboclart

    MrBumboclart Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    9
    In his prime Whitaker had no glaring weakness and no obvious style appeared to trouble him.

    HOWEVER Floyd has shown some trouble with certain styles. Fast hands - Judah. Awkward footwork and angles - Augustus.

    Sweet Pea takes a decision here.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    269
    Whitaker had a bit of trouble with fast hands too - Delahoya, Hurtado and Roger Mayweather. A technician like McGirt gave him all he could handle too
     
  6. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    33,921
    Likes Received:
    134
    Whitaker by decision.

    His southpaw style.

    His jab.

    And his workrate.

    Would be the keys to Sweet Pea's win.
     
  7. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    9,612
    Likes Received:
    2,502
    Stopped reading after the first sentence. You can assume he wouldn't win titles in 5 different divisions, but you can't say for sure.

    As for the matchup of mayweather and pea at 135? I'll simply say that I don't think any fighter could beat a prime Whitaker at 135
     
  8. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,183
    Likes Received:
    8,691

    I agree. Whitaker could do everything just that little better than Mayweather.
     
  9. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Messages:
    8,611
    Likes Received:
    33
    Give me a list of all those WBC/WBA champs in the 80's he would beat from S/F to L/M in your perfect world & don't forget to timeline it.
     
  10. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    8,850
    Likes Received:
    239
    He could've beaten, Samuel Serrano for SFW in say 1982, Bramble or Ramirez a couple of years later, Rene Arredondo in say '87, 147 maybe Vaca (Breland is too damn tall), and in '89 well shoot Rene Jacquot maybe although that's not a done deal. None of them are and I kept it in the 80's.
     
  11. salty trunks

    salty trunks Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,740
    Likes Received:
    80
    I dont think you can say Whitaker always beats him. Floyd is so underated because of his personality but he can do more offensively than Whitaker can and hes dam good defensively. I say its a very close fight and Its a pickem fight in my eyes.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    269
    The WWs/LMWs would have been harder, but I'm not sure how many actually beat him at his best. I don't see anyone beating him 140 and down bar potentially Sweet Pea, I don't think Chavez would, I think Mayweather could manage to replicate what Whitaker did largely.

    He'd get battered by the top 154lbers like McCallum, Hearns and Norris (ok 90s). He'd lose to Hearns/Leonard a 147. I could see him beating Duran and Pryor from 140-147 though. Curry/Honeyghan/Starling are tough fights he could maybe pull off

    I think less money that he'd make in the 80s would have made Mayweather a better boxer, as he'd be more active and more hungry.
     
  13. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    29,420
    Whitaker would have been able to handle Floyd with relative ease. Better jab, better angles, better combinations, better mobility, better workrate, and better inside skills. He's handled all kinds of styles and would have been able to figure Floyd out as well.
     
  14. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Messages:
    8,611
    Likes Received:
    33
     
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Ring smarts and boxing IQ are greater than Pea's.. what are you basing this on?