I don't understand the new count back rule, Before they'd erase the highest & lowest scoring judge, add up the rest & that gave you the winner, dunno if it's changed though
I heard somewhere that they just randomly pick a winner if its a draw. Could be bollocks, but just what I heard... Wouldnt be surprised
That's a really bad system to award a bout, atsch but I still think it was close & could've went either way, no way was it a robbery
well it was if its a draw it goes to countback and it was 53-52 after you take away the top and lowest scores from each round, they claimed it was 52-52 and then it goes to the press red or blue and it was 3-2 for Agogo, but it shouldn't have got to that point in the first place
I think we've moved on from that debate. The new debate is about the judges ability to add numbers. Which is why I think it will be overturned.
One good bout this decision is, Hartell's gonna have mega odds against Ogogo definitely 100% gonna back Hartell
what a farce amateur boxing can be. instead of talking about the quality of the boxing most of the conversations are about what the judges do