Prime Johnson v Prime Langford,Jeannette,McVey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Aug 5, 2012.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    97,855
    29,312
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jack Johnson gets a lot of flak for not defending against his best black challengers, some of it is undoubtedly deserved, but I believe racism,politics ,and financial considerations were all significant factors in those fights not being made.
    Irrespective of this, how would he do against the trio if all men were prime, fit, and focused?
    Below a young McVey with a rather slender Johnson, pre - title days.

    This content is protected
    Below,Sam has Jeannette on the floor in their historic Paris fight.

    This content is protected


    McVey, with a countenance that was said to," be able to scare back the rising moon".

    This content is protected









    Below the fearsome Langford, about to punish a clumsy Iron Hague for dropping him.

    This content is protected






    A younger Sam, below.

    This content is protected












    Jeannette right.

    This content is protected



    Joe again.

    This content is protected


    So, how do they do against Jack, prime for prime,and 100%?
     
  2. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    I would favor Jack to beat all three of them.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,418
    48,842
    Mar 21, 2007
    He should be favoured; he was an incredible, incredible fighter. But if he fought McVey in January, Langford in March, McVey again in June and Jeanette in July, could we really expect anyone to beat them all?
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    97,855
    29,312
    Jun 2, 2006
    That's an interesting counter question, may I add a rider to it?

    If anyone would be likely to do just enough to get the verdict , and still leave a couple of fights in the tank ,I think that would be " Little Arthur."
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,418
    48,842
    Mar 21, 2007
    Fair to say, but that type of brinkmanship is just what might see him outpointed by one or another of these monsters.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Johnson, they may have improved after he fought them but so did Johnson. Johnson's pre title win was very dominant against all the best black contenders.

    I think usually the best man wins in boxing, usually, so yes I think he'd pull that off, I mean he sort of did anyway beating Jeanette and Mcvey countless times and dominating Langford

    I suppose it depends how much we think they improved, I have a feeling it's a tad overstated because Jeanette and McVey were already picking up world class wins when Johnson was beating them
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,677
    27,394
    Feb 15, 2006
    He probably beats Langford up to about 1910, and looses to him after that.

    He probably beats McVea any time they fight.

    Jeanette is a potential spoiler for him at any time.

    So in summary, it is not so much a question of whether he could beat them all, as whether he would best them all in sucession.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Johnson was peak in 1910, he would have trained for a Langford fight and be near peak up until 1912, after 1912 Langford himself was past his prime. By 1915 both significantly past their best.

    The talk of Langford overtaking Johnson in terms of ability is the biggest myth on this forum, it never happened
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,677
    27,394
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,677
    27,394
    Feb 15, 2006
    On a side note, this is how I would rank them in terms of resume:

    1. Lagnford
    2. McVea
    3. Jeanette

    This is how I would rank them in terms of the value of Johnsons actual wins over them:

    1. McVea
    2. Jeanette
    3. Langford

    This is how I would rank them in terms of the threat they posed to Johnson at their peaks:

    1. Langford
    2. Jeanette
    3. McVea
     
  11. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,818
    Aug 26, 2011
    I think Johnson beats them all, and I may be in the minority, but I don't think they would be tough fights. As they improved, so did johnson, and thus things would remain the same. It wasn't like he barely beat them.. he totally outclassed them in virtually every way... You just don't make up that wide a difference.. when johnson also filled out and got better.
     
  12. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Langford gives him the toughest fight prime for prime, always. Wouldn't bet against Sam winning 3 or 4 out of 10 fights against Jack.

    Jeannette and McVey wouldn't be easy fights prime for prime either but I have Jack beating them both.

    What about Harry Wills?
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    Johnson beats all of them handily...
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,600
    47,852
    Feb 11, 2005
    In at least two of the three fights there would be a draw which 100 years later an army of apologists would explain away with their oft-used arsenal of excuses... poor shape, handcuffed, drunk the night before, staged, was not engaged in the fight...

    Nothing new here.
     
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,818
    Aug 26, 2011
    Except that Johnson reign and pre title resume are still better than many people after him.. even your beloved Liston...