Is anyone defending the potential PAC Cotto rematch at 154?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hook!, Aug 6, 2012.


  1. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    I CBA to read through the threads, thanks.
    Edit: 150
     
  2. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    It's got to be a full weight 154lb Cotto and not some catchweight fight.
     
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    I guess this proves Floyd has more balls than Pacquiao
     
  4. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    Yeah I got mixed up, edited the OP sorry
     
  5. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    if Cotto wants to avenge the loss, those are Mannys terms, just as Cotto insisted on a catchweight for Margarito, a NY Only venue, and of course the everlast gloves.
    These are Mannys terms and if Cotto wants to try and turn it around well take it or leave it Manny doesnt need Cotto
     
  6. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    So you think it is cool?
     
  7. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    Pac n Arum want the fight more than Cotto to duck Floyd, he just lost to Bradley and he gonna lose if he fights Marquez so why not try drain Cotto AGAIN
     
  8. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    if he agrees there are no excuses he is also been on the record stating that the weight for their first fight was not a problem so I do not see why people are crying that he was drained when he himself said he was not
     
  9. killjoy408

    killjoy408 Active Member Full Member

    1,402
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  10. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Cotto himself said the weight was no factor so why are you making **** up when Miguel himself says the exact opposite :think
     
  11. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    haha i mean if he rematches Bradley he gonna get robbed again so Pac wont take it
     
  12. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest


    He did lost to bradley you filthy crab :lol:

    Don't tell me you fell for that HBO cheerleading nuthugging BS everytime Pacquiao throws punches that misses and crowd yells and that probably made your panties all wet.

    I bet you haven't even watch the fight again and again without the HBO sound or a diff commentator.

    Bradley beat Pacquiao DEAL WITH IT. And he did it with an injured ankle in round 4. DEAL WITH IT.

    Imagine w/o the ankle injury, he would outboxed the shyt of Packy. :happy
     
  13. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    How so? Floyd had a catcweight fight against a man who moved up 2 divisons and Floyd blatantly failed to make the weight agreement....
    thats a cowards move right there, and you all talking about How Floyd moving up 2 divisons to fight Winky blah blah blah get the **** out of here with that stupid ****
     
  14. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    I dont think the weight is a problem for Cotto... After all he just asked Margo for a 150lbs catchweight...

    People gonna whine, no matter what.. The fact is Cotto will always be more effective at welterweight... He loses speed, power, mobility, and his agility at 154.. His careful matchmaking just seems to have fooled these fly by night fans..
     
  15. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    except Manny is the one that needs Cotto and asking for the rematch. Cotto can easily fight Canelo and move. Pac doesnt have many viable opponents left.

    Cotto should be able to run these negotiations.