When your best win is 38 year old Corrie Sanders...

I can't believe I found this gem. Older Klit..Vitali did beat Sanders.

Wow, and you think you're fit to evaluate the worth of fighters? You don't know who beat who, who is who, what happened..etc.

:nut

 

I do not see the word 'practically" in any of these statements. Even than by using "practically" it means nothing, 38 year olds have been proven threats to the HW title. End of discussion. You just don't have much of a leg to stand on here.

"38 year olds have never been a threat to the HW title anywhere in its history....until planet Klit came along."

"a 38 year old was never the arch enemy of a HW champ"

 

I mentioned both Wlad and Vitali in the post you just replied to, not either one or the other. I made a comparison in direct reply to you mentioning both Klits.

I think its a trifle unfair for you to refer to a past error when I have cleared up the issue in the post you are replying to. But if that brings you joy, please enjoy.

 

Are you ****ing kidding me?

 

this is the reference to the other thread about Lewis and Vitali. Thats where I made the error - I read this and thought I was on that thread.

 

-Did not happen. Vital iis the only Klit referenced here that's and in response to your claim. You are the first to refernce Wlad in your edit to horribly cover up all your fact botching which only made things worse.

The post you quoted has no mention of Wlad or both Klits as you put it.

"Vitali stopped a 38 year old Sanders to win the vacant WBC and Ring titles. Vitali wasn't the Champion going into the fight and he certainly was not destroyed by him. Hard to be destroyed by the man you beat to a pulp, no? Vitali's best win is a matter of opinion but I don't think many would describe Sanders as his "arch enemy" when they only had one rather one sided match. "


-Past error? You can't keep your story straight for more than two posts at a time. My interest was disputing your inaccurate claims, but you keep changing your inaccurate claims to even omre inaccurate claims.

 

There we go, it was THIS thread we were arguing about Lewis and Vitali on.

I didnt cross reference threads, ha, I cross referenced posts.

My apologies for that mistake, though I am sure noone is interested in hearing that by now.

 

I told you I was referring to my last post, not that much older one.

Thanks for paying attention.

 

You are telling me to "pay attention"?

I think you need to quit posting and sort out your thoughts. You don't know who or what you are posting about anymore.

 

It would be a start if you quoted the actual current post you are replying to, if your intention is to reply to that current post.

I am ready to admit when I am wrong, but one requires the other party to accept the admittance.

Odd to justify your mistake by saying I made a mistake so its all good to make another one. If we all did that then threads would be a chain of nonsense.

 

-I did reply to your last post. You can clearly see it was quoted. Dude, you can't be this cracked in the head? :nut

-You certainly are not ready to admit to being wrong as you've now spent countless posts trying to wiggle your way out of completely errorenous statements.

-I have not made any mistake or admited to making a mistake, so I'm not sure what the hell you are reading. Sure you haven't got threads, posts ,or whatever mixed up again? You seroiusly think this is me justifying a mistake I made?

"I think you need to quit posting and sort out your thoughts. You don't know who or what you are posting about anymore."

I'm ****ing telling you that your posts are not making a lick of sense. And you need to take a break and figure out what you are trying to say.

-Your claim that a 38 year old has never been a threat to the title is totally wrong.
-Your claim that a 38 year old has never been the "arch nemesis" to a Champion is wrong.
-You can't logically apply either blanket criticism to Wlad or Vitali
-You can't tell Wlad or Vitali apart.
-You dont' seem to be reading my posts as you've credited me with comments or conclusions I never even remotely posted.

Just what the hell are you trying to say?

Here's a thought:

Make up your mind which brother you want to criticize, actually gather the correct facts, study the history of the sport so you don't end up looking like an ignorant kid who just came here to hate on the Klit brothers, NEVER make blanket criticisms, form a solid argument that can be logically applied to one of the borthers, and post your findings. Its really not as complex or hard as you are making it out to be.