Muhammad Ali is overrated

Some say that was the only duck "the rematch" ,I'll have to rewatch it to see the 8 count..

 

Did you just say he was luck y in the thrilla in manilla atsch
He won that because Frazier quit before him that ain't luck.

 

The only thing worse than useless threads like this are the people that post in them.
Yes I'm despicable

 

I want a lot of people who have commented in this thread to die.

 

Thr amount of time he fought after proves he was prime :rofl.
Duran fought for near 20 years after he faced Hagler and he definitely was not in his prime.

 

So who is better young one?
Dont be fooled by TheWiseJester. He's ****ing stupid.
Ali was either #1 or #2. So he's either the best or the second best.
So what are you talking about? "Not the best by some distance" Really?
Tell us then?

 

**** this cocksucker..

 

Remember this rule,

"you're never as good as the fans say or as bad as the critics say."
Everyone is simultaneously underrated and overrated.

 

Exactly. He don't know **** about boxin'

 

No.

 

These young kids dont know about boxing Huh?

He said beating Frazier was luck!atsch

You cant beat Frazier by luck!

 

club*

 

If you have to drop down a weight class and can only pick one guy then that means they aint overrated..

Sorry boss, you dont know ****

 

He's the best heavyweight of all-time.

Pound for Pound Ray Robinson is the Greatest of all-time.

Even Muhammad Ali himself stated that Ray Robinson was the greatest of all-time.

But the pound for pound nonsense is all bull**** anyway. You can only really compare heavyweights and fighters from the same era.

Muhammad Ali was the greatest of his time, Larry Holmes or Mike Tyson where the greatest of the 80's, Lennox Lewis or Evander Holyfield where the greatest of the 90's etc.

I don't think anybody thinks when the term "Greatest of all time" is used for Muhammad Ali........that it is pound for pound!

It has always been referencing to him as a Heavyweight.