Yeah I tend not to listen to them. And this goes for most commentary in boxing in general. Never acknowledge the away fighters work. Just pretend like they don't even exist and give barely no credit.
He's nearly 28 isn't he? Can't see him turning over or staying am, GB will always look after him Gutted for him, nicest lad on the team
I thought stalker won that fight. I had him losing the first by 1, winning the second by 1 and bossing the third. Easily won that by 2/3 points. Don't know wtf the judges were seeing
You guys are mental, stalker lost that by about 2, lost the 2nd and last round and maybe a draw for the first, the commentry was ****ing awful, get the blinkers off.
pfffft **** me ive heard of home town decisions before but that was the absolute reverse gonna spend the next 24 hours defending this great sport of ours to my mates cheers judges atsch:twisted::nono
I honestly thought Stalker bossed the third, throwing good counters regularly while the other lad was hitting gloves and arms. I'd watch it again but pointless really.
Do body shots not count then ?, because tom took a lot of them, i really thought he lost and hate how ritchie can be so crap when a british fighter is one, but brilliant when none are up
Body shots obviously count, but not if they're below the white line, which a lot of the other lads shots were and the ref mentioned this during the fight.
Oh yes cause i thought he lost im a troll good way of thinking. Stalker got a gift in his first fight, and lost this one simple as that
I personally thought he won this one and lost first fight, whatever though. Just thought it was a troll were you said he lost by about 2 points but then said he lost 2 rounds and 'maybe' drawn one.
That commentary was so biased it's unreal. Imo the Mongolian clearly won the first, Stalker nicked the second and the third was very close.