Why would Pac take the Floyd fight without settling his score with Bradley?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012.


Page 1 of 4
  1. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,355
    4,781
    Mar 8, 2008
    I don't get that. Am I the only one who feels he should take out that scrub first?
     
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    #1
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yes, for the most part, you are. But of course there's a bunch of idiots here who will agree with you.
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 10, 2012
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 10, 2012
    #2
  3. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,355
    4,781
    Mar 8, 2008
    So you think Pac going into this mega fight was a loss (albeit, a tainted one) is better than him avenging the Bradley fight?
     
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    #3
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    No one really cares about things like that. Did Hagler make Duran avenge his defeat? Did Floyd make Shane go back and beat Winky? Or did he make DLH beat Hopkins first? Nope. Because that type of stuff, really isn't what makes or breaks fights.
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 10, 2012
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 10, 2012
    #4
  5. Poonpuppy

    Poonpuppy Active Member Full Member

    1,128
    0
    Feb 9, 2012
    Because if he loses again he can pretty much kiss the Floyd fight goodbye.
     
    Poonpuppy, Aug 10, 2012
    Poonpuppy, Aug 10, 2012
    #5
  6. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,355
    4,781
    Mar 8, 2008
    I see what you are saying, but Shane was coming off a big win against Margarito before he fought him. A lot of those examples have a time element in them too. Floyd fought DLH years after the Hopkins loss.

    I kinda disagree with your argument. I mean, if Pac had fought let's say, theoretically, twice by now and won both, then I would agree with your argument.
     
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    #6
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Since everyone seens Pac vs., Bradley as one of the worst decisions, that pretty much renders the actual result moot. People just want Pac. vs. Floyd after this much bull****. And a terrible decision shouldn't factor in a continued delay.
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 10, 2012
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 10, 2012
    #7
  8. rk16

    rk16 Member Full Member

    336
    0
    Aug 18, 2011
    Spot on.They can't risk another loss so its better to take the money fight and then go and seek revenge with Bradley
     
    rk16, Aug 10, 2012
    rk16, Aug 10, 2012
    #8
  9. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,355
    4,781
    Mar 8, 2008
    He ain't losing to Bradley twice. **** that noise.
     
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    #9
  10. Poonpuppy

    Poonpuppy Active Member Full Member

    1,128
    0
    Feb 9, 2012
    You never know...

    Maybe they're not willing to risk it.
     
    Poonpuppy, Aug 10, 2012
    Poonpuppy, Aug 10, 2012
    #10
  11. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,355
    4,781
    Mar 8, 2008
    I guess. I feel Pac would take him out in a rematch. He wouldn't let the judges touch it.
     
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    vargasfan1985, Aug 10, 2012
    #11
  12. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    because when he gets robbed again no point in the Mayweather fight, Bob Arum robbed him then straight away said fight Marquez so that guarantees he gotta fight 2 fights before a Floyd fight, if he rematched Bradley in November he'd say **** a Marquez fight
     
    |A|C|S|, Aug 10, 2012
    |A|C|S|, Aug 10, 2012
    #12
  13. haworths623

    haworths623 Guest

    I very much doubt any judge will try and rob Pacquiao again against Bradley, who simply doesn't have the tools to beat Pacquaio by any other method than blind judging.
     
    haworths623, Aug 10, 2012
    haworths623, Aug 10, 2012
    #13
  14. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    pacs lawyer gacal said he thinks bradley is next. i sure hope not LOL
     
    Boxing Fanatic, Aug 10, 2012
    Boxing Fanatic, Aug 10, 2012
    #14
  15. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Straight in with the Mayweather fight.. Mayweather will put him into retirement then he can concentrate on being a politician.
    Pac since coming of the peds just isnt the same fighter anymore..
     
    REEVO, Aug 10, 2012
    REEVO, Aug 10, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 4