Better defense Whitaker or Mayweather

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by devon, Aug 11, 2012.


  1. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    I don`t want to ruin the thread but just need to say... he had plenty of opportunity vs the man who was voted FOTD in floyds own era... he lacked the ambition & drive often found in elite ATGs to get the man in the ring & do his thing... he cannot get a free pass after such actions, especially vs a proven elite ATG like Pernell Whitaker.
     
  2. DaveK

    DaveK Vicious & Malicious Full Member

    3,668
    35
    Mar 2, 2009
    Something told me I shouldn't word it that way...

    I'll rephrase: Floyd didn't fight against a level of opponents as impressive. He chose not to take the dangerous fights and top rated guys.
     
  3. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    :happy:happy:happy

    And nice avatar too :good
     
  4. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    Yep, El Duran was le Man :good
     
  5. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Floyd has a better guard as far as head shots go, but he has been raked to the body by a few fighters and is way more hittable there than Whitaker.

    I can't think of a time Pea took more than a couple good shots to the body in any single fight, and that's with facing some really body punchers, like Chavez, Vasquez, Haugen, Ramirez.

    Compare Floyd versus Castillo, Hatton, Chavez, Cotto.

    Not sure how Floyd's D is more "varied" either....
     
  6. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    So was El Buchanan! :good
     
  7. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    It's close, but I'd say Whitaker. Mayweather is better at offense, mainly because unlike Whitaker he does not have pea-shooters for fists.

    Despite having so little power, Sweet Pea was more entertaining because of his work-rate and willingness to take risks.
     
  8. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    I disagree. Pea could do everything, he was a more varied and effective offensive fighter, both in the pocket and on the outside. If you look at the Haugen fight or the second McGirt fight, Pea can throw any punch in the book with bad intentions and perfect technique, and can put a hurting on someone despite not having Julian Jackson fists. Mayweather is good offensively, but he's over-reliant on the straight right, doesn't throw enough punches, and was never exactly Bob Foster either.
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,022
    12,914
    Jan 4, 2008
    Don't think Floyd has taken that many clean blows to the body. Castillo and Cotto, for example, had some succes in trapping him against the ropes and belting at what they could. But for being in that position I think Floyd did a good job avoding really damaging blows.

    The difference between them here is probably rather that Whitaker's generalship made sure he rarely ended up in such a position. But Chavez sure landed some.

    With "more varied" I mean how Floyd uses gloves, shoulders and elbows as well as angling of his torso to block and deflect blows. Pea put more focus on head movement IMO. Floyd is the best I've seen at not getting hit clean without moving any part of his body more or less.
     
  10. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    I think you're dead wrong. Watch the Cotto fight. He absolutely tees off on Mayweather's stationary body pretty often, and really rips in the bodyshots and lands deep and clean. Same in the 1st Castillo fight if I remember correctly. I think you're being confused by the fact that Mayweather seems to have great 'body resilience' to punches - he never seems to react to taking a big bodyshot. But that shouldn't obscure that his body is right there to be hit when he is on the ropes, and does get hit. I think if you re-watch Mayweather vs Cotto, you will re-think the above statements.
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,022
    12,914
    Jan 4, 2008
    I urge you to rewatch it instead.:good

    Castillo had more success landing clean in their first fight than Cotto ever did. He was allowed to hold and hit quite a lot, though.
     
  12. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    Yes but, unless I'm misremembering, Whitaker wasn't as accurate as Mayweather.
     
  13. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    Are you thinking of head shots? Cotto didn't land a lot of clean head shots other than straight stabbing punches when Floyd was trying to roll on the ropes, but Cotto did land clean, clear, solid bodyshots throughout the fight. :huh
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,022
    12,914
    Jan 4, 2008
    Not many considering the position Floyd was in. The large majority of Cotto's punches were either blocked or deflected - entirely or partly. That's largely why Cotto won so few rounds, despite being the aggressor and more active. Floyd just needed to finish most rounds with a couple of clean head shots to win them even though he spent most of them on the ropes.

    Just to clarify: I'm of course not saying PBF couldn't be hit clean with body shots. He could and was - just like every fighter. But he was better at deflecting or blocking them probably than any I've ever seen.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,022
    12,914
    Jan 4, 2008
    You're a big Pea fan, I see. Think you're right in what you say about Floyd here, but you're overrating Pea a bit. He was very good but no Ricardo Lopez in terms of punching technique. If Floyd is over-reliant on his straight right, Pea used his too seldom. Preferred to loop it instead.