Arreola's loss to Adamek looking worse and worse

This content is protected

 

Adamek beat fatty by speed, output, and just overall better professionalism and athleticism. Us Poles never have to worry bout one of our own coming in out of shape..

Too bad fatty doesnt have the motivation and will to at least try to act like a professional boxer, like Adamek is.

 

Didn't read the whole thread, but I have seen a fat flabby Golota, possibly from too much Chicago Polish Sausages in between sparring sessions at Windy City Gym.

In regards to Chris, I have said time and again, I am not taking him seriously until he can present me an iota of dietary self restraint. How many more years are we going to have this excuse, Chris? Come on Chris, lets be real here.

 

.

A 39 year old Golota? Umm, sure. Not a prime one. Chris is in his prime, Andy was shot and old by the time he started taking boxing as a hobby, like Chris does.

 

Don't get me wrong brother I'm not making excuses for Chris anymore. Time and time again Chris has let us down and I've long past had it. I gave up on Chris "the Cow" for good after the VK fight when fatso weighed in at a lean 250. Chris had all the ingredients in place to produce something special that night-- an ancient Quitali and the home crowd advantage at Staples Center. Guess what-- Chris blew it on the biggest stage and I'll be the first to admit Chris doesn't deserve another shot. Chris choked and once again turned to the Burrito stand. Even IF Chris losses the weight (by some act of a merciful God) he already waisted his prime being the fatso he was.

 

Watch the vid.

Stop bitchin'.

 

this is the Adamek I want to watch, hitting, moving, and generally making his opponent look like a lost *****

 

Arreola has no prime unless we're talking about prime ribs

 

Yeah its better than when he's running like a *****

 

Adamek's toughest opponents P4P:

1. Dawson (lost)
2. Vitali (lost, got wobbled by jabs)
3. Chambers (lost, robbed Chambers)
4. Cunningham (won, fairly close cards in spite of three knockdowns)
5. Arreola (won, got wobbled, got barely past an injures fatass)

Once he steps up, he loses. And I don't know where that "natural LHW" crap comes from. Adamek clearly looked his best at 200.

 

46-2

 

Haye could have fought Adamek instead of Fraudley, and made as much if not more money. Or he could have fought Adamek in addition to Fraudley, Ruiz, etc, and made millions on top of what he already made if he was so sure he could take him. Adamek only went after a Klit after unsuccesfully trying to get a fight with Haye who wanted no piece of him despite everyone on these forums saying Haye-Adamek would have been a great fight. Adamek was wiling, Haye wasnt. :hi:

So much for cleaning out the HW division...

 

Are you bragging with his padded record?

 

Padded? Are you just a troll or something? :huh: He has a pretty decent resume spanning LtHW to HW. Certainly it's not spectacular, but saying it's padded shows you jave idea what a padded record is.

And hate to tell you, he did beat Chamber. Yes, it was close, and some had it for Chambers. Are you seriously one of the forum idiots who consider closes fights a robbery if the guy you hate wins?

 

:huh you've changed the post haven't you? you were talking about haye. that's who i was saying was the third best heavyweight in the world. not the fat man. damn, he's not even the third best american heavy.