Floyd or Duran - Most skilled?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Garrus, Aug 17, 2012.


  1. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Yeah you are ****ing with me, I went into your post history, you had me going.
     
  2. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    we need a poll on this shite. this is getting good :yep

    i dont think many will disagree with me when i say duran was a beast at the lower weights. floyd too but in a different way. floyd is a masta at defense. but, duran was 1 of the most complete fighters ever at the lower weights. he was like a wall, literally. excellent combo puncher plus u couldnt hurt him
     
  3. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    Done.
     
  4. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    5-2 in favor of Floyd.

    mrtony/Rex, what are your reasons for choosing Floyd?
     
  5. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    cobra, your reasons for Duran?
     
  6. NOTINDAFACE

    NOTINDAFACE No Me Se Rajar Full Member

    2,475
    1
    Mar 22, 2010
    Thank you!!
     
  7. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    Really, the only reason I chose Duran was that he grew a viscous beard.


    Floyd has none, shameful.
     
  8. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Mayweather dose more things better than most boxers. Including Duran.
     
  9. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    ripshitty, hello.
     
  10. 1_man_army

    1_man_army The Knockout King Full Member

    2,511
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    When people see the word skilled on ESB they read it as defense eventhough there is more to skill than just defense.

    In terms of defense Floyd is better because that is the basis of his style, sitting back and counter punching. Now he can do more than that but that is the foundation of Floyd's stlye so it stands to reason that he can sit back and counter better than Duran. However, Duran has one of the best defences that I've seen for a come forward fighter. Duran was very skilled at coming forward and slipping shots as he was being the aggressor. People seem to have this notion that he got hit with lots of shots and relied on his chin but it isn't true to anywhere near the extent that people believe it is, Duran slipped shots very well.

    Duran is undoubtedly the better boxer when it comes to offense. While Floyd is good - throws certain shots well and has under-rated pop on his punches, he just doesn't have the variety, power or application that Duran has when attacking. That also stands to reason since Duran has a more aggressive style than Mayweather.

    I would go with Duran on the reasons above and the fact that he did it against a better level of opposition for such a long period.

    As I said, it all depends on what you look at though. 'Skilled' has almost become a by-word for defense and counter punching on here but all areas should be taken into account.
     
  11. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    981
    Dec 16, 2007
  12. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Great post.
     
  13. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    Any Floyd supporters like to counter 1 man army's points?
     
  14. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    That'll do it.
     
  15. Renofan

    Renofan Member Full Member

    484
    0
    Sep 25, 2005
    On paper, one could argue Floyd has better skills, and thats HIGHLY debatable........but boxing isn't fought on paper. Mayweather has never faced a thunderstorm quite like Duran.