Technically, it was a closer fight than it appeared at first, but PAC still won. Also worth pointing out is that PAC looked like he was taking it easy. Bradley looked like he was barely staying afloat.
Prelude you are obviously ******ed. Did you see compu-box stats?? Did you see the PUNCH that caused Bradley to fall backwards and twist his foot?? Obviously you are a blind bias fanboy. And a ****** as allready mentioned.
until you show me video clips of Pacquiao landing the harder shot you ain't got ****. Bradley landed shot after shot all night...and they were hard shots also. Pacquiao getting his azz beat all night and here's proof [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNY9z5pWulc&feature=player_detailpage[/ame]
Look if you had Bradley winning you are either a ****ing ****** or a Pacqiauo hater. He won 9-3 or 7-5 if you REALLY like Bradley and give him every round within question. Keith
Pacquiao didn't dominate but he clearly won. I can see how you could give Bradley more than 5 rounds, he simply didn't do enough or land enough to win. So while competitive it was clearly a robbery as it was an easy fight to score.
why? cotto won at least 2 clear rounds against floyd plus 2 close rounds and busted floyd's nose. bradley won 1 clear round which is the 10th.