Nicholson Poulard next for Froch?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Lilo, Aug 19, 2012.


  1. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
  2. micky

    micky Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,957
    15
    Feb 19, 2005
    Sounds plausible and with Froch's resume I have no real gripe against him taking what on paper seems a very easy fight.

    It makes sense they want him to look a monster before the Bute fight it will whip the Canadians up into a frenzy etc and make the rematch easier to sell and quicker to sell.

    Not the fight I wanted but hey we all like an easier day at work from time to time, I know I have said it before work some days, "should be a doddle today" why not allow that for a boxer, works for me, after all we know what his next fight is, Bute in Canada.
     
  3. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    waste of time, and why fight Bute again when you Kod his ass already? Fight any of the two Andres or fight Kessler
     
  4. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    Why fight ward again when he got beaten so easily?

    For me it has to be Kessler rematch.
     
  5. BoxingObserver

    BoxingObserver Member Full Member

    408
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    I am not so sure on Nicholson Poulard.
     
  6. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    Apparently they aint announcing the opponent today, just dates and ticket stuff. Opponent named on 28th
     
  7. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    Because of a contract perhaps? Froch would never have got the fight in the UK in the first place without the rematch option. It's right that Froch keep that deal.
     
  8. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Hearns been saying that for 2 months.
     
  9. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    the only reason they wouldnt announce the opponent is if they dont have one yet

    I sense they are having real problems getting anyone half decent.

    but then again, Froch in Nottingham is a ****ing miserable assignment
     
  10. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
  11. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    So far that's Kessler, Oosthuaven and Poulard that all wanted none of it.....

    It's going to be hard ****ing work, who's left? Pavlik? He won't get on a plane I can tell you that
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Worst fight of the year if so. Karpency level. Dreadful.

    The whole 'Froch deserves an easy fight' not if he's had six months off. Well, not an opponent of this level. He could've beaten him a week after Bute.

    Modern boxing is wank.
     
  13. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    I thought it would have been Bika but the postponement of naming the opponent does make it look like Hearn is struggling.
     
  14. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    He already offered Kessler out, failing that he offered young, unbeaten belt holder Oousthauven a shot, it's not like they didnt TRY to get a good opponent in
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    And? So they go for a complete joke of an opponent instead?