How would Jack Johnson fare vs. his predecessors in the following matches?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Aug 21, 2012.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    How would Jack Johnson fare vs. his predecessors in the following matches? Assume 15 rounds, a 20 x 20 ring, and a rule set that allows excessive clinching to tip the odds in Johnson’s favor.


    Vs. Jack Dempsey


    Vs. Gene Tunney


    Vs. Joe Louis


    Vs. Rocky Marciano
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think he beats Demspey definitely. I slightly favour him over Tunney but I wouldn't be confident.

    Louis and Rocky would both beat him on points.
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,459
    9,334
    Jul 17, 2009
    Dempsey and Tunney - Johnson on points.

    Marciano - Marciano on points.

    Louis - Louis by late round stoppage.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,700
    51,536
    Mar 21, 2007
    These aren't his predecessors. They are some of his successor.

    He'd be tough for Louis, but I believe Louis would get there.

    Marciano would beat him on points.

    Dempsey, I'd say he's close to 50.50.

    Tunney is a very interesting fight. Very interesting.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,484
    30,294
    Jun 2, 2006
    I like him to beat all four by decision. Tunney would be stylistically tough.

    Louis is problematical in how he deals with his excellent jab , but come forward bangers such as Dempsey ,and Marciano did not fare well against Johnson.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,484
    30,294
    Jun 2, 2006
    This is what attracted me originally ,since he beat past prime versions of two of his predecessors.:huh
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Is anyone else getting high on Tunney lately? it seems he's rising through my rankings on a daily basis and I can't really explain it :lol:
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,484
    30,294
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think he looks excellent on film ,the problem with "The Marine" is the lack of depth at heavyweight on his resume.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    yeah it's pretty much just: Dempsey, Greb, Gibbons, Risko, Weinert.

    I wish he'd have fought Wills and Sharkey so we could have had a better gauge of his abilities with the bigger men. But I agree on film he looks amazing, seems he can do it all.
     
  10. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,305
    1,867
    Sep 13, 2006

    Jack Johnson is the fighter you root against, because you cannot stand his style. But he's also the fighter that you don't bet against, because he gives everyone big troubles. These guys with pretty styles who may look tremendous against most everyone else, well, they get in there with Johnson, and suddenly it is an entirely different ball game, and everyone is wondering why they can't get off or land anything, and they are getting gradually picked apart, pecked, poked, and surprisingly jolted in a semi-dull fight. Just think B-Hop with even more strength and power.
     
  11. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,459
    9,334
    Jul 17, 2009

    Johnson was way ahead of his time,fistically.
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,477
    Sep 7, 2008
    Predecessors :lol:

    Marciano would gladly outwork him while Johnson grabs him and throws the occasional chopping right hand. He'd slow Marciano down but this fight is going to be Marciano smother Johnson agains the ropes trying to hurt him while Johnson hugs him. Marciano 15 round decision

    Dempsey to either bang Johnson out or get dragged into Johnson's game and lose on points. I'll go for the latter with some shaky moments for Johnson.

    Louis would waste Johnson.

    Tunney quicker, and he'll stay at his range. Johnson will find it pretty hard to get off I imagine. He'll have chance to work his way in but Tunney times his right hand down the middle and comes forward, but Tunney would reset if it got too hairy and has the chin to take the blows Johnson does sneak in. Tunney on points.

    Adam Pollack puts it brilliantly though. I'm basing this on him looking horrid and whilst given him props for effectiveness it's the factt that when push comes to shove over the 12/15 round distance I think the fighters that came after Johnson had a more judge friendly style. Fight to the finish and let Johnson stink it out as much as he wants and I'd probably favour him against more of the very best.
     
  13. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,463
    2,821
    Aug 26, 2011
    I see him beating Dempsey pretty comfortably once he gets past the fist 2 rounds.. which he would.

    Tunney.. is a good stylistic fight and I think it would be a close fight... but Jack would get it done.

    I've always believe Jack would beat Joe.. he hit hard enough to put Joe down.. and would do so.. and smart enough to not get hit with Joe's combos and savy enough to clinch when needed and do some of his good inside work. Good fight but Jack takes it.

    I would give the best odds to Rocky... I just see him more active than all the others and thus I think he takes it on points. If there was a recipe to beat johnson it was REALLY acitve fghters. That is Rocky more so than all the others.
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Thread should have read vs. “ Sucessors “ , and included an option for zero wins. I guess I have to post too early in the AM these days…

    I have seen you compare Hopkins to Johnson, and I think they are very different in many respects. Luckily we have plenty of film on both for a compare and contrast.

    Compare:

    1 ) Both were good counter punchers who didn’t always engage.

    2 ) Both could fight a little dirty

    Contrast:

    1 ) Hopkins has a high guard. Johnson does not.

    2 ) Hopkins throws more punches on film. Johnson throws far less punches, and this would be a real problem in many fights, since he was not known for early stoppage wins.

    3 ) Hopkins was often matched vs. class fighters in their prime. Johnson fought very few class fighters in their primes, and the one he did were MUCH smaller than him many cases. Johnson really did not accept matches as champion ( 1909-1915 ) vs. the best out there in Langford, Jeanette, Gunboat Smith, or McVey. When you in there with shorter, less skilled or past their prime opponents it’s not that hard to look good on defense. The lone man Johnson fought with skills was O’Brien, and his defense did very little here. So would any prime all time great heavy with skills really have a hard time landing on Johnson?

    4 ) Johnson clinched far more than Hopkins did.

    5 ) Hopkins fought guys his own size. Johnson seldom fought prime guys his own size or bigger yet when he did he lost to Hart and Willard, and for what’s it’s worth was whacked out in a 4 round sparring match vs. Gunboat Smith when Johnson was a champion in his prime. Smith of course was a white hope type only in name, not ability with wins over Willard and Moran…yet not title shot for him?

    6 ) In a pound for pound sense, Hopkins was far more durable.

    I agree, Johnson can frustrate very short heavies ( 5’7” burns, @168 pounds ) stationary super middle weight types ( Ketchel ), or short fringe contenders types ( Flynn ), but many could do the same. Any top heavyweight worth his weight in salt should blow these types out. Taking Ross the distance? Not impressed. Barely outpointing Moran? Not impressed.

    I think Johnson would likely win one match here and lose there.
     
  15. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    258
    Oct 22, 2009
    Johnson
    Johnson
    Louis
    Marciano