Thomas Hearns vs Michael Nunn At MW

McCallum was totally schooled in the first fight with Sumbu.

And clearly Kalambay did not deserve the second Graham fight. Frank you are a boxrecing mong.

 

dis klirli shows wu iz e boxrecing mong .

end den d 1st paragraf olso

 

How could I deduct that from boxrec? Watch the fight you twat.

 

bai riding it woz held in itali .

end ai wocht it wanc , wozent it wen kalambay actuali nokt grehem dawn ?

or did yu not now it bikoz it wozent riten in boxrec ?

 

Hearns UD.

 

Speak english man

 

akshuali it woz inglish , riten d rait wei

 

i slightly favor mcallum but not if hearns hurts him early(1st 4/5). otherwise the bodywork gets to tommy and he becomes slower/less balanced

 

No, he knocks Graham down in the first fight. Second fight is where Sumbu is dropped twice and thoroughly outworked.

 

I thought Kalambay was dropped in one of the late rounds as well, but the refree didn't count

 

Yeah, but that wasn't significant enough to mention in my one line write up of both fights, or otherwise I might've included the numerous flush rights that did have Graham backing up, alas nothing as good as the right that detached him from his senses in the 12th round of their first meeting.

Both on YouTube in one piece :good

 

If were talking about Hearns before the Hagler fight and jump up to 175
I think he knocks Nunn out.