Harold Johnson was championship grade for 12 years...but he had Archie Moore in front of him all that time. Many say he won the Pastrano title defense also in 1963.
Not a great but Jermain Taylor is a recent example of a pretty quick decine, Lacy also but Joe ruined him.
Pipino Cuevas is a prime example. He was considered damn near indestructible through his title reign then got blasted out by Hearns in 1980 and even though he was still a young man, he was basically finished as a top fighter. He never won another big fight and he suffered many embarrassing losses. All this downfall occurred while in his early-mid 20's so not a case of a broken down old man at the end of his career.
Julio Cesar Vasquez went from great performances against Davis, Medina, Wright, Whitaker and Daniels to just being a no-hoper practically over night.
Terry Norris Tyrell Biggs Frankie Randall Vivian Harris Junior Jones Kevin Kelly Roy Jones Pernell Whitaker
Tyson comes to mind. some boxers like Hearns or Hagler or Duran who have different options can fight on and modify their style a little but Mike was so dominant that any little slip of his talent and he started to lose. Just by not moving his head as time went on, he was hit more and what was his greatest asset (defense) was not that anymore.
terry norris declined suddenly. getting beat by mullins then another guys months later sweet peas; looked great against de la hoya in april 1997 and then looked shot later in year and then got murdered agsainst tito in early 1999
from what period after foreman 1 in 1973 or manilla 75. he still looked a great force after foreman but was shot after ali 3. dont think it was that sudden really. he had
Pea was having his problems even before Oscar, he needed a desperate come from behind KO against Hurtado in his previous fight just to keep his big payday with Oscar alive. He also had issues with Rivera before that. Pea was probably too deep in the coke at the time: he'd slack off and need to pull fights out of his ass against guys he shouldn't have had problems against, then put it back together for his big fights, or at least enough to give a brave effort like he did with Trinidad.
tyson lost a lot after 1988 but was still a great force and was still no1 in world till jail in 92. i thought the decline at the end of his career was shocking. thw way he couldnt ko danny williams and kevin mcbride
Shocking to tear out your knee and then lose to McBride at nearly 40? How well Tyson seemed to extend his career considering his style is more amazing than his decline. I guess that speaks volumes about his phenomenal ability. He had great speed even well into his 30's.
I whole group of highly rated fighters went down hill fast once BALCO closed its doors. So they did not have the talent, skill or ability we were led to believe, it was just absence of PEDs that exposed them. Some of the above mentioned fighters benefitted from slick, iron-handed management and "declined" once there was an influx of real talent in their division or they were forced to fight opponents they were previously protected from. I mean, Bowe probably would have "declined" quicker had he actually fought Lennox Lewis instead of tossing his belt into a garbage can. And of course, there's simply undiagnosed health problems that could cause a fast deterioration.