The WBA had Frazier ranked so low because they dropped him from #1 to #7 after he refused to participate in their tournament. These ratings are deceptive.
Italy didnt exactly have the most sterling reputation when it came to its handling of boxing. It still doesnt quite frankly. Another knock against it and reason why a lot of fighters didnt jump at the chance to fight there was the fact that they allowed the EBU to govern their rules. This was seen by many fighters in the USA as a detriment. Compare the supposed offers being thrown Ali's way to fight in Italy against cold hard numbers of what was actually being paid to fighters in Italy, and what Ali was making elsewhere and then tell me it was a realistic to expect him to go fight Corletti there. Yup, everyone was scared of a guy who struggled with even his modest level of competition. When Chuvalo is the best guy youve beaten you may want to rethink claiming you are being ducked.
The WBA, quite frankly was somewhat confused with there earlier ratings. For the WBA Tournament, they kept shuffling the positions, and tried to create an American Division, and a European Division. Without ABC-TV broadcasting the events, the tournament would have been a complete flop. At the time, everyone knew that the Top 3 Heavyweights were Ernie Terrell, Joe Frazier and Thad Spencer.
September 1968 Ring Magazine *** Cassius Clay 1....Joe Frazier 2....Jimmy Ellis 3....Jerry Quarry 4....Oscar Bonavena 5....Manuel Ramos 6....Leotis Martin 7....Sonny Liston 8....Al Lewis 9....Eduardo Corletti 10..Henry Clark Not a bad ranking.
This is why some of us really appreciate Senor Pepe's threads. He gives recognition to fighters who are rarely mentioned. And even though he offers a critical view of Muhammad Ali, he sure as hell provides more interesting an original material on Ali and his era than any of the 'hardcore' Ali fans on here. I mean, the Ali fans on here never have anything much to say that can't be found on the sports book shelf on any decent book shop. I've rarely seen the big Ali fans on here even acknowledge Ali's amateur career in any sort of detail, for example. I welcome anything of that sort from Ali's fans. But Senor Pepe is the only one making the effort. :good
None of them. The mid to late 60's was a little light on talent in the heavyweight divison. Frazier was not a force until the end of the 1960's, and Patterson had back issues. Quarry and Terrell were solid, but would not do well vs. either Klitschko. Ring magazine rankings for 1966: Ernie Terrell Zora Folley Thad Spencer Floyd Patterson Karl Mildenberger Joe Frazier Oscar Bonavena George Chuvalo Johnny Persol Manuel Ramos This content is protected : (by the time this came out, Ali was about to be sent into exile) Muhammad Ali, Champion Joe Frazier Thad Spencer Jimmy Ellis Manuel Ramos Jerry Quarry Oscar Bonavena Floyd Patterson Hector Eduardo Corletti Karl Mildenberger Ernie Terrell
Thanks for the Kudo's. Very Much Appreciated, Not to harp on it, but back in 1965, 1966 and 1967 - Thad Spencer was getting a tremendous amount of press on the 'west coast', and there were many articles written about him. There was a 'power play' for his contract in 1966, as Willie Kethchum got him away from Walter Misnkoff, that he is why he was idle during the first half of 1966.
Go back to the current forum dame, and realize that different era comparisons can be almost impossible to compare. Ex: In 1960 your Klit boys would a more gangly 220-225-ish. In 2000, Patterson would have been a more chisled 205'er. Enough of the period comparisons.
I agree, your Thad isn't there, considering he had just gotten ass-wiped by Quarry and would never win another fight. Hey, no Patterson? My beloved childhood hero would step into the Stockholm ring at this time and, perhaps, beat Ellis. Ramos? Lewis? Clark? Corletti? "not a bad ranking?" Get real, an aging Floyd would have waxed the lot. AGAIN! **** on your Cassius obsession, **** on your contenders being better than they are and bring us some substantive threads based on your obvious knowledge of boxing.
jowcol,,,,, Floyd should have been in The Ring ratings, but he was removed for inactivity, and avoiding fighting several ranked contenders, when the offer to fight them presented itself. Not sure if you were there in 1968, but everybody wanted to fight Floyd, to knock him off. Not one fighter avoided him, they all wanted him.