Mike tyson vs vitali klitschko???

Just like he stopped that other elusive featherfisted midget Chris Byrd?

 

Hoya is 1.79m
Tyson is 1.78m

Tyson has a 71″ reach
Hoya 73″

Speed speaks for itself.

Skill, most probably to Hoya.

Julian Jackson is 182 cm
Reach is 73"

 

And, your point is?

Tyson knocks both of them out in 1 round each

 

Weight is the most important thing in boxing, and you said it doesn't mean ****.

 

This guy is obviously a troll or maybe he has an extra chromosome. He's basically saying Vitali is heavier so he would beat Tyson. Bull****...

 

Way to take things out their context, give me one quote where I said Vitali beats Tyson because he is heavier.

 

When your talking heavyweights it doesnt mean ****.

Peters and Arreola were 240+ sometimes, are you telling me they would beat Tyson too?

Chris Byrd was a 210 when he beat Vitali, Vitali outweight Byrd by approx 35lbs

 

Well explain to us in which way do you mean it? If you aren't going to back yourself up then people are going to do so, the way you bang on about it its like the heavier man will always win. Do you mean its the most important thing in the sense it decides which category a man will fight in, because then you are essentially correct.

 

I said it is the most important thing.
Not saying a heavier fighter always wins against lighter opponents.

Also Vitali quit because he had a shoulder injury and a lack of heart, not because he got outfighted.

More weight = advantage.


You can also look at Holyfield his KO% at cruiser 70+%, at HW 30-40%.

The reason Tyson would win against De la Hoya is because the extra speed, skills, height and reach wouldn't be enough to beat the weight advantage.

Vitali is at some points inferior to Prime Tyson, but he still has a weight advantage which does mean ****.

 

I attack a point that extra weight doesn't mean **** while it does.
Weight is an advantage, a big one.
There are weight limits for a reason (while there aren't reach or height limits)

Prime Tyson had the tools to negate weight disadvantages against heavier opponents because he is the best small heavyweight ever.
But the fact that Vitali has an advantage at weight is something that is there to negate for Tyson to win....
Luckily for Tyson, he is better at putting combination, higher speed, better one hit power, skills too.

 

More weight does not mean an advantage, it slows you down and Vitali was never fast to begin with.

Name me a fight where Vitalis weight helped the outcome of the fight?

Tyson is better than De La Hoya. Tysons better than Vitali too. If Tyson and De La Hoya were in the same weight division, Tyson still beats him.

Just because Tyson is bigger than De Lay Hoya, doesnt give Vitali a free pass against Tyson.

Holyfield moved up in weight, but he was also fighting better opposition, guys like Foreman, Holmes, Mercer, Bowe, Tyson and Lewis.

Finally, Vitalis weight would have no connection to the outcome on this fight. Vitalis simply isnt good enough to beat Tyson.

 

You're basically shooting yourself in the foot. As you said, when fighting the primed Mike Tyson if anything weight was a disadvantage as it was against the young george foreman. More likely not to be able to avoid being hit...

 

:deal

 

I am sure Vitali can run to a points loss, but coming forward against Tyson is another matter, it might end in his 2nd ko loss.

 

Anyone who picked Vitaly is clearly a Stormfront wayciss and a nahzzi who wants to kill 6 million jews.