Lucian Bute v Denis Grachev delayed coverage on Sky!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Nafflad26, Sep 6, 2012.

  1. Nafflad26

    Nafflad26 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't know why they can't just show it live. Whats the point in this delayed coverage rubbish? Show it live and then repeat it throughout the day!!!!
     
  2. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,948
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wouldn't do the numbers live to warrant them putting it on
     
  3. It costs more to show it live.
     
  4. Nafflad26

    Nafflad26 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    It can't cost much more to show it live plus won't Sky have someone kind of deal with interbox because of the first fight with Froch and the rematch which is due to take place? Plus if it was down to money then Boxnation would of shown this fight live as they would of outbid Sky.
     
  5. afonso_alves

    afonso_alves Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    510
    Likes Received:
    0
    when is the fight?
     
  6. So if it's not financial reasons then why aren't they showing it live?

    Is it just to **** people like you off?
     
  7. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,853
    Likes Received:
    5
    You make me laugh and read my mind. not in a gay way like.

    anybody that stays up to 5 in the morning to watch bute versus a scrub needs their head examined
     
  8. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,948
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tbf Grachev is a decent fighter, but still anyone that stays up till then needs to sort it out
     
  9. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,948
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would cost more than double to show it live pointless really if it is on only 3 hours later. No they wouldn't sky have much more spending power than Boxnation that is obvious
     
  10. Nafflad26

    Nafflad26 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0

    They don't have more spending power on boxing otherwise Mayweather v Cotto and Martinez v Chavez Jnr would of been on Sky. Sky's boxing budget has been cut due to Sky going big on F1.
     
  11. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,948
    Likes Received:
    0
    If sky really wanted those fights they could have got them, they have the ability to spend more. They just didn't want them because they would have made a loss on them, but they still have the ability to spend more
     
  12. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,853
    Likes Received:
    5
    Theyve also got to get a studio team / sound team / camera team and so on for a live broadcast.

    This way they can just throw dave darts some fish heads into his cage and get him to read the prompter at 8 with just him and his keeper behind the camera
     
  13. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    11,130
    Likes Received:
    0
    except it does.
     
  14. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    34,567
    Likes Received:
    1,280
    The real question should be.....

    Will showtime ante up and show Bute Froch 2.

    This whole Grachev biz is hoakie. Why the hell is Bute even fighting this kid?:nut
     
  15. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    17,931
    Likes Received:
    11
    For Bute,this is par for the course.Silly but may be a confidence builder.