He have a loss on his record, yes. But he has never been DEFEATED. He has never been KO'ed or outpointed in a match which wasn't ruined by lucky cuts. The guys who say Klitschko would have KO'ed Charr, what do you base it on? Vitali couldn't even KO Chisora!!! He sure as **** wouldn't be able to KO Charr, his punches didn't even hurt him. No one has ever KO'ed Charr and Klitschko didn't at all seem able to be the first one to do it, Charr was completely fresh after the match, with angry outbursts and posing. Charr was out of balance and got a punch in the backhead which made him fall and get right back up, but people honestly use this as an argument? Now, really? Charr "didn't do ****", as some people call it, because he was waiting for Klitschko to tire out. And if it would have worked or not, I don't know. You don't know. WE don't know. Klitschko was gifted some luck by Charr being cut. Not luck in the sense that he would have lost, 'cus we don't know if he would have lost, but luck in the sense that Charr never got the chance to go wild. And we saw what happened when Charr went wild in the last round. Klitschko was on the run. If Klitschko got any balls, he will give Charr a rematch. 'Cus he has yet to beat him. So far, he has just outlanded him for 4 rounds, but a fight can always turn around and to me, it never seemed to be in Klitschko's favour, he seemed to punch himself tired, just as Charr wanted him to. If Klitscko retire now, he will retire in disgrace, like Lewis did. If Klitscko doesn't give Charr a rematch, it will have exposed Klitschko as a *****, sorry.
So, what do you think about TKO6, stupid Klittard? Klittards ESPECIALLY should shut the **** up about this match, they whined like stabbed pigs after TKO6.
A brilliant and inciteful comeback! Ruskill, I eagerly await your future in-depth analysis of all things boxing. :thumbsup :roll:
So far, none of the Charr-haters have come with any good arguments. I think it's a shame when an underdog like Charr shows up and actually shows so much courage, just to get disrespected by everyone. I don't consider this a loss to Charr, at all. Klitschko should give him the rematch, and if not, Klitschko (most likely) saw the same thing I was seeing - a long and tiresome match for his old body against a tough and very motivated opponent.
Who actually gives a **** if he would have ko'd him or not, he was bashing the **** out of that fist pumping twat.
Touching gloves was to show respect, you idiot... He wasn't a punchbag, READ BEFORE YOU POST, you idiot. He was trying to TIRE KLITSCHKO OUT. He wasn't attacking like he COULD. You saw what happened when he attacked for real. Klitschko was on the run. So STFU with noob comments.
Yeah, for FOUR ****ing rounds, there were EIGHT rounds left. You think only 4 rounds could tell you the outcome? N00b.
Noob? Vitali was just getting started on bringing the pain, Charr was going to end up mangled. You only needed to see the four rounds to realize the inevitable outcome,dread to think what his face would have resembled had it gone the distance.
The exact argument Klit-tards use against Lewis somehow magically works in reverse for Vitali. Not a big fan of irony eh?
Wtf? Lewis won the fight, simple as, this has no bearing on the Charr fight atall. I'm no Klit ****. You seriously think Charr was going to somehow come out and beat Vitali? The bloke might be 41 but he's still leagues ahead of someone like Charr for **** sake. Charr is not Lennox Lewis.