we need a larry holmes

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by slickback, Sep 12, 2012.


  1. DrBanzai

    DrBanzai Active Member Full Member

    1,389
    22
    May 11, 2012
    Ken Norton....well past his prime when they fought.

    Michael spinks....Larry lost to him twice. Larrys best fights are to a guy lost to.

    Earnie Shavers, good but far from great.


    Larrys jab was ****, easily his most over rated quality.


    :patsch
     
  2. slickback

    slickback Active Member Full Member

    575
    2
    Mar 26, 2011
    Lmao have you seen the second fight? :hi:
     
  3. slickback

    slickback Active Member Full Member

    575
    2
    Mar 26, 2011
    Please tell me your top tier heavies :hey
     
  4. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    berbick? Mercer? These are wins that make you a "great"?
     
  5. Lennox

    Lennox Active Member Full Member

    972
    43
    Oct 13, 2010

    You are out of your element.
     
  6. DrBanzai

    DrBanzai Active Member Full Member

    1,389
    22
    May 11, 2012
    Larry is not one of them.

    Post yours, I will be happy to laugh at your pathetic list.
     
  7. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    First, he fought a peak Mercer when he was 43 years old. Secondly, to answer you question...if you throw the Berbick and Mercer wins in with everything else he accomplished then yes, he is a great.
    And I don't care what anyone says, he won that first Spinks fight... they just didn't want him to break Rocky's record.
     
  8. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    I didnt think many people gave much of a **** about him both back in his day and after he was gone. Wasn't he regarded as a sort of a recess champ filling the void between real heavyweight stars?
     
  9. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    Lol nobody gives a **** about marciano or his record. They robbed him because he couldn't draw flies to **** and had no personality, spinks was more marketable while holmes was too shy and soft spoken.

    mercer started boxing at like 32 years old
     
  10. Lennox

    Lennox Active Member Full Member

    972
    43
    Oct 13, 2010
    It doesn't matter who won the first Spinks fight. **** happens.

    But he absolutely should have completely dominated him in the rematch. He couldn't and didn't.

    And this alone will always hurt his legacy from anyone who truly understands the fight game.
     
  11. slickback

    slickback Active Member Full Member

    575
    2
    Mar 26, 2011
    Phuck you all Larry a G, go hump Hayes toe you phaggots
     
  12. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    i agree. If it was such a robbery why didn't he win by destruction in the rematch?
     
  13. Lennox

    Lennox Active Member Full Member

    972
    43
    Oct 13, 2010
    Who brought up Haye? You did, kid.

    I can't stand Haye but at least you can jerk off to his youtube vids.
     
  14. Lennox

    Lennox Active Member Full Member

    972
    43
    Oct 13, 2010
    Exactly. It is really, really simple.

    Holmes should have absolutely dominated Spinks in the rematch.

    He didn't...and it exposed him for what he was. A great fighter who is nothing more, nothing less.

    Imagine if Louis went life and death with Schmelling the second time...or Lennox with Rahman...Wlad with Brewster, etc...

    Holmes should have clowned him and he couldn't.
     
  15. slickback

    slickback Active Member Full Member

    575
    2
    Mar 26, 2011
    Who you calling a kid punk?

    I can rock you at PlayStation