What's More Impressive Multiple Defences or Having Multi-divisonal Championships?

Depends on who you fight.

 

^^
This.

 

Quality of opposition is what matters the most.

 

multiple divisions mean nothing if you cherry pick one of 8 guys holding a title

 

Far too much of a generalistaion there Dipset.
Would you say Chris John was better than Humberto Soto?
It's horses for courses.

 

Taking everything at face value I tend to favour multi- divisional championships

For instance, Armstrong's 3 weight class championships is more impressive to me than his streak of defenses at welterweight.

 

Depends on Opposition, but it feels good looking back at a record and seeing a champ dominating for a certain amount of years.

 

Defending your title is what boxing is about.

 

It depends if you're the #1 guy in that division, or just defending a paper belt

 

Cleaning out a division should be of paramount importance.

 

Cleaning house in a single division is more impressive because you take on all comers, bad styles and low risk/rewards too, where cherry picking your way up in weight as your body naturally or PEDurally grows is not that special.

 

:good


Climbing is overrated.

 

Depends on who you fight and if you're the legitimate champion, or pick up paper titles.

 

Depends.

If you are in a very weak division and the guy up or down is much stronger... then changing divisions!

If you are in a strong division and have a belt, but bolt from division to division to pick up cheap belts while avoiding the sharpest opponents, then impressive wins in the division is better!