The fact that Harada outstripped Lopez in every way imaginable in a shorter time than his long title reign shows that Masahiko>>>>>>>>>Ricardo It is not up for debate, anyone that seriously wants to try to justify it and not troll can f'n bring it :bbb
Am i the only one that thought Fenech looked so-so against Shingaki and that the Jap was hopeless. They were ponderous performances from a man unsure yet of what stylistic approach to take.he got a whole lot better very quickly, but those aren't fights i'd mention as among his best by a long shot. If that Jeff had fought someone like Lora he would definitely have been handed an early loss from which to learn from.
The Jap' was a basic southpaw admittedly, but Fenech showed both aspects of his game. I think it's the 7th round of their first fight, he's punch perfect and nigh on unhittable. Not one of his 'best performances' IMO but as you can see I've pretty much just gone for his bantamweight fights to draw on my analysis, so whatyagonnado?! Mature performance for a lad of so few fights IMO.
No. You believe it or you don't, I said no trolling, and for a man of your integrity you'll already have analysed and made your mind up on Lopez's opposition and ring record, achievements etc etc
Damnit Flea I had a powerpoint! But I would struggle to put Lopez in the top 75 and couldn't keep Harada out of the top 40.
Thanks. I think a more interesting case for how you view consistency versus big wins would be another Mexican great versus Harada. So I ask: Chavez vs Harada. Back to the topic at hand what is Fenech's best work at bantam? For Canizales its probably Hardy or Seabrooks (although I think Bones Adams is best guy he best there).
Has to be McCrory and Coffee, though you might as well include the Zaragoza win as an example of his level at the time, even though it was closer to 122.
Coffee. Did looked drained against McCrory. And Ears, the fat black kid laughing in what looks to be a cinema...?