Tunney v Jack Sharkey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by FastHands(beeb), Sep 17, 2012.


  1. FastHands(beeb)

    FastHands(beeb) Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    407
    Oct 28, 2010
    McVey "inspired" me to do this...

    Say the fight is made instead of Tunney's defence against Heeney and the VERY BEST Sharkey turns up...who wins?

    If Sharkey wins, how does that re-shape boxing history? What happens to the HW title between 1928-30...any ideas?
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,540
    Jul 28, 2004
    Tunney beats Sharkey at any stage of their respective careers. Ice and discipline over hot headed emotion every time.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    An "on" Sharkey would be a handful for any heavyweight, imo.
    He would be going into this fight with fairly recent wins over Wills, Godfrey ,and Delaney, and he was doing pretty good against the Mauler till he turned his head.
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,540
    Jul 28, 2004
    That's the kind of **** that spells the difference between him and Tunney essentially. Doing stupid **** like that in the heat of battle...that spells out "lack of discipline".
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,099
    Feb 15, 2006
    Obviously Tunney should be favoured, but Sharkey on his best day might just turn the trick.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,072
    45,317
    Feb 11, 2005
    Agreed. Got to go with the more consistent fighter here. Also, when Gene's hands were healthy, he had good power, which Sharkey did not.
     
  7. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,672
    Aug 18, 2012
    Tunney wins. All time great beats a much less than all time great.
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Dempsey didn't turn Sharkey's head..He crushed one of his testicles. Cheap win, should have been a DQ for Sharkey.
     
  9. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,672
    Aug 18, 2012
    If you watch the fight which you obviously have not there is no sign that dempsey hit Sharkey that low. Maybe slightly below the belt or on the belt line but no way as low as you are trying to indicate.
     
  10. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    red cobra already said it best, sharkey has the body but the not the head to beat tunney
     
  11. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0RLqeVfxo8[/ame]

    3:52, it's really tough to tell clearly (even with the later slow mo replay)
     
  12. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Tunney was simply a better and more focused pure boxer over the hot-head Sharkey... Tunney wins a boring 15 rounder by a few points on all the cards, and see's Sharkey scream robbery.... Tunney was a seasoned pro, where as despite being a pro himself, Sharkey was an enigma to a large degree.....

    MR.BILL
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005


    your kidding right? :lol::roll:

    Look at sharkey's facial expression after dempsey hits him twice very low, he is in excrutiating pain as he turns to the referee...his hand goes low to grab his balls..a natural reaction when you get hit in the nutsack
     
  14. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    if jack sharkey and meldrick taylor had a baby, it would be zab judah
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    5:54 such a blatant right uppercut to the balls by Dempsey