Manny says 45/55 split is ok, as is any testing!!!

It doesn't matter. The point is Floyd averages higher numbers.

Can't go back before Oscar as it's clear that both fighters had a career change at that point. :deal

 

Manny must be kicking himself in the ass for not accepting the 14 day cutoff and the 50/50 back in 2009-2010. Guy waited to long and now has stayed the same in drawing power while Floyd has gone up and the revenue shows this.

Funny how nobody wants to let the numbers speak. Everyone seems to think the economics of the BUSINESS will be ignored for whatever reason.

It is not going to change and the numbers is what Richard and Oscar will go by. They tell the truth and aren't bias like a person.

Send the books to the 3rd party accounting firm, and if Manny really does deserve 45 percent he'll get it. The numbers will most likely support a 59/41 split in favor of Floyd.

 

in May wasnt Pac firm on 50/50?

Changes his tune again.

 

He always does. I wonder Arum is so hesitant to send the books to a 3rd party accounting firm to see what each fighter gets.:huh:think

This would allow both fighters to make their fair share based on their numbers since becoming mega stars.

 

So somehow you forget Dela Hoya outing Mayweather and there team when the deal was almost done and Floyd pulled out.

****ing stop making excuses for Floyd he has had more excuses than I care to remember any fighter having.

Even Marvin Hagler thinks Floyd is full of **** with the excuses.

Oh and the biggest one.

His a Terminator and me and my family are concerned for my Health.

ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR OK Floyd.

Who cares Floyd will be broke in 5 years anyway. The way he bets.:deal

 

Cool story but I only deal with posts that actually have valid info.

Your post shows nothing. Good try though.:good

 

It doesn't matter? You're comparing two data make it equal for me to see the truth behind your estimates

You cant go back before Oscar because it's a shiity PPV for floyd :nut

 

It is equal. I am showing every single one of their fights since becoming superstars.

So then go back and look at Manny's. Nothing will change man. Plug in their numbers pre De La Hoya.

I don't corrupt the numbers. I simply use every fight since the Oscar fight as that is when both fighters career's changed. The numbers SUPPORT THIS.

Your the one trying to get bias ass numbers up in there. I put up the numbers since both fighting Oscar man.

I even give Manny the BOTD and use Arum's released numbers which are higher than what was actually released. You just don't like it because it puts your boy Manny in a bad position.

Floyd has done 6 fights and Manny 8...I don't control how many times they fight, I only post the non bias numbers with using Oscar as a kind of common factor for both fighters.

You mad huh? You hate it that the numbers support a 59/41 split. LMFAO.

 

Ow Cmon just include the data I need to see their last 8 fights. Enlighten me boxing genius.

I will never accept that 6 against 8 data is equal in comparing numbers. Simple Mathematics!!

 

Then don't accept it. It doesn't change that that is the number of fights they have had.

Also, Floyd has done more revenue in 6 fights, than Manny has done in 8. :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

These floyd fanboys use numbers of convenience. He says he's using numbers of them as superstars? Then why is he including the DLH, where floyd was NOT a superstar, or even the 'A' side! It was DLH's PPV, not Floyd's anyway. Ask him to provide averages where Floyd and pac are the 'A' sides, and see what kind of bull**** you get. :deal

 

What is there to hide? All im asking is give me the 2 PPV's of Floyd before Oscar:think

 

Their draw power CLEARLY changed De La Hoya and beyond. Manny did 320K in PPV buys with Diaz while Floyd did 350K with Carlos Baldomir.

Manny did 400K in buys with Marquez 2 while Floyd did 350K with Judah.

I don't have the revenue from these. You will corrupt the numbers if you throw in fights before Oscar for either fighter. The numbers will not show any "truth" as to what the draw power is today.

LOL just like a *******, trying to twist n turn numbers to fit their argument. In the meantime I just post them as they are and make my argument from there.

 

I am using Oscar for both. They were both B sides for Oscar little boy and that is common between them with that fight.

Your pointless to debate with because you don't look at info in front of you and only worry about who is posting so you can insult them. That is what *******s do.

 

LMAO so its 350 and 350 for his 2 fights and surprisingly you dont have revenue from these 2 fights. No wonder it's not included in your data comparison :happy