Manny says 45/55 split is ok, as is any testing!!!

Terminator.......

 

well that concludes it then. you can't do it. :hi:

 

Very nice. So did you plug the numbers in or...

So what is your way of deciding a fair split?

Please don't tell me 40/40/20 to the winner or something cuz floyd takes a paycut if he loses while Manny gets to make 17 million more his high payday if he loses and also see Lara Williams and Whitaker Chavez as to why you wouldn't do this.

Floyd has a career high of $45 million while Manny has a career high of $25 million.

Try using the revenue to fit in somewhere as well, as this WILL be used in negotiations so no need to ignore it here.

So what should the split be since you don't agree with using non bias numbers?

 

I already did it man. It's right there for you. I'm asking one of you *******s, who never posts anything with a valid source or valid info, to do it.

C'mon *******, I did the common factor being Oscar and it was simple. Now you go and try to do it. In fact, I used 14 total fights while common opponents would only be 10.

Let's see, c'mon let's see if you can do it.:hi:

The worst part of it is, I already did all the work for you; all you have to do is delete a few fights, add and divide, and you got your numbers.

Note-Looking at it and estimating, the common opponents support a 57/43 in favor of Floyd (based on math in my head and no calculator.)

 

Why concentrate the topic for the common opponents? You started this math equations, I'm just asking for the last 8 PPV's of both guys and then you compute for us.. 8-8 seems equal to me.

 

Also this goes to thatman.

When such fighters Past and present have been quoted as saying Mayweather is scared to fight Pacquiao heres a list of some of the guys that know more about the Mentality side of boxing than both yourself and myself.

Larry Holmes
Marvin Hagler
Timothy Bradley
Miguel Cotto
Oscar Dela Hoya
Shane Mosley

Whats your comeback for that yet you know one of the very few to say its Pacquiao that is Scared

50 ****ing Cent.

Now thats funny right there.

 

How come he won't go through stringent testing (or at least request it) with JMM to remove the burden of doubt? Pac saying he'll go through "any" type of testing is like the average ESB member telling us he's going to have sex with Katy Perry as soon as they meet for coffee.

Of course there's that very tiny chance John Mayer (or whomever Katy is ****ing these days) is a boxing fan and is an ESB member but I think I've made my point clearly.

 

Holds bias. Your taking numbers from Floyd pre De La Hoya yet you don't use anything from Pacquiao pre De La Hoya.

So again, use the 5 common opponents and you have 5 and 5. Your way holds bias. Netiher Floyd nor Manny were anything close to what they were from Oscar on.

Do you not get that or something? Do you not see that using pre oscar numbers would not be truthful with the numbers.

If you want it so bad, go do your research and plug it in. I did all the work for you, so plug it in.

If you use 2 fights pre Oscar for Floyd you have to use 2 fights pre oscar for Manny. Their draw power changed since Oscar man.

This guy is easy to **** with since he doesn't get the main point of using only fights after Oscar.

So go do the 5 common opponents and then there is no bias.

 

Cool bro and I'm sure they do. Doesn't change the numbers. That is their opinion and I can't change that. I can only put up sources to support what I'm saying. Care less on their opinion. My neighbor across the street thinks Manny is ducking while his wife thinks Floyd is ducking. Your post showed nothing in relation to thread topic.

 

point it to me. i don't see it on this thread. here's what im requesting.
1. remove oscar from the equation,
2. how much difference in $ does 59/41 (your equation) 55/45 and 57/43 (your equation)
3. jack kollin's asking last 8 PPV.
4. why don't you include how the economic recession affected the PPV buys.

 

Fair split is 55 to Mayweather 45 to Pacquiao.

I dont see a problem with this as both are huge draws.

As the great Marvin Hagler said who cares who makes what or who is the bigger draw as they are both huge stars.

If you want to be great you fight for a Legacy not for I have more PPV sales than you do type Bull****.

You can do all the statistics you want on it but unfortunately you keep making excuses for Floyd were I may be a Pac fan but believe both men are at fault.

More so Floyd as everytime Manny bends to his ****ing needs theres another excuse.:deal

 

That is based on your opinion. I am talking what the numbers FACTUALLY support.

 

Pacquiao tries to promote every fight he has by talking about potential fight with Mayweather so I will believe it when it actually happens.

It's funny though but if he had agreed to the testing back in 2009 like he says he is now then he would have had 50/50 and this **** could have been put to bed years back.

 

Yeah has nothing about the Economy of late and how that has been effecting the numbers.

The sad thing is thatman keeps coming up with bull**** numbers.

When your the two best number drawers for PPV and Mayweather has a bit of a edge in America that is certain.

What dip**** fails to realize is that Manny would outsell Mayweather in Asia and Australia as well as the UK.

Im happy with 55/ 45 as a fan and for the sport that seems fair.

**** 3 years ago it was OK with Floyd to except 50/50 now all of a sudden as Pacquiao said Yes its not OK to take 55%.

Just another excuse from Floyd fans and Floyd as well.

 

1. Not removing Oscar as that will corrupt the numbers.
2. I am using $105 million as the TOTAL that both fighters will earn.
3. Using any ppv before Oscar also corrupts the numbers. I offered the 5 common opponents to make it fair but he doesn't want that either. 5/5 is better than taking pre oscar fights from one guy.
4. The economic recession did not effect ppv buys. That happened in 2008 and since then there numbers have gone up, not down. One poster used $$ amounts in 2007. I do not know the equation but it was approx. the same as I put (go find the thread, as I'm not taking the time to do it.) It was posted in July I believe.:huh