Which is a perfectly legitimate stance to take. As long as you keep off of revisionist ******s like Bremen who actually believes that prime Lewis would lose to Vitali despite having beaten Vitali on his worst night, you'll be fine among us.
Who care“s about the scorecards. It was a TKO win. IMO TKO 3 because of the cuts the fight should have been stopped in the third 3. Vitali said the stoppage against Charr was legal because of the cut, so the Lewis fight had to be stopped after 3 rounds. Lewis TKO 3.
Yes. Lewis robbed him by repeatedly punching Vitaly in the head. Frank Bruno was up on the cards against Lewis too from memory.
Lewis lost to Vitali and Bruno while he has two wins each against Rahman and McCall. On Planet Klit that is.
Vitali wanted Wlad to quit before and DURING the Peters I Fight. "Everyone in that camp was paranoid and didn't have much faith," Steward said. "Vitali told him he should quit. But we needed to take the risk. Never once did we panic. He showed a lot in that fight. before the start of the 12th round, Vitali questioned Steward's decisions and wondered if his brother could finish the fight. Instead, Klitschko landed his best punch of the night that round, a perfectly placed left hook -- a punch Steward had been working on with him -- that sealed an improbable unanimous decision win.
You guys are priceless with you're consistent lunacy. Get over it already, Vittles got tko'd, end of story.:rofl
Yes, he was robbed because Lewis hit him with some huge shots and cut the hell out of his eye, and continued to open the cut up more and more with punches. But yes, Vitali was robbed