The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. And the 5 WBO judges, all scored it for Pacquiao in the review.

    It is widely accepted it was a huge robbery where the judges did not do their job, either through incompetence or corruption.

    And lot more boxing journalist watch a lot more fights that judges, and quite a few of them were their that night.
     
  2. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    wtf why are you ***gots discussing all these match ups i thought this thread was to talk **** about floyd noskillweather?
     
  3. Marquez had Pacquiao winning by 5 rounds easily.

    Floyd Mayweather Sr, Roger Mayweather and Jeff Mayweather had Pacquiao winning
     
  4. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    This content is protected
     
  5. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    bradley sd12 pacquiao

    This content is protected
     
  6. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    On the first weigh in. Ok he was justified. Floyd was justified asking for olympic style blood testing because the commission testing was PROVEN to be flawed by a few fighters such as Shane Mosley and Holyfield.

    So both are proven and Floyd agreed w/out hesitation. Your boy Manny bitched and complained about having to give blood. Now he pricing himself out.

    None the less, I already won man...I'm on my way home and you still fighting with the ref in the ring about your loss. You remind me of Zab Judah after fighting Kosta. Go check that fight out if you don't know what happened after the KO.:deal

    LOOK how this ***** ignored my underlined question? He knows he got proved wrong so he just resorts back to bull****.

    Puga, SJS is your owner. I am not debating/owning you anymore. I have made you my ***** in this thread w/out any doubt.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so finally you *****s concede that oscar was overweight. so when has pac tested positive before to justify floyd accusing him of PEDs? this all came out from floyd getting worried that he **** his pants and avoided facing pac like his father advised him.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,049
    11,084
    Jan 6, 2007


    Before you Completely lose your ass, laughing it off, where did I say there was a 116 lb division, or a 107 lb ?


    If you go back and read what I wrote, I said:



    And both statements are true.

    In 1995, Manny weighed in at 107 twice, once for his bout with Rocky Palma and once for his bout with Montejo.

    He was 16 years old for both bouts.

    Hence, he boxed at 107 at age 16. That was the weight he weighed in at for the bouts. Got it ?


    And in 1996, he weighed in at 116 for his bout with Bert Batiller. Manny was 17 at the time. Thus, he boxed at 116 at age 17. Getting the picture.



    I've been following the sport since mid 1965, and I even knew there was no 129.5 lb division, genius. :yep

    And yet Floyd once boxed at 129.5

    Amazing.


    You completely missed the ****ing point.

    Both men weighed in at approximately the same weight for fights they fought at the same age.

    Am I giving you a clue yet ?

    Hence, the point put forth by Floyd that he took years longer to get to his current weight is bull****.


    Ponder it a bit, lad.

    If you need more guidance here, you could phone a friend.

    Or I could draw you a diagram.
     
  9. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012

    You dummy you always **** your posts up. Yea for one hour until the 2nd weigh in Oscar weighed .5 over the contracted limit.

    It does not matter that he never tested positive. Mosley beat those tests and later on Petersen did too.

    next please as this guy is way to easy to prove wrong. I need more of a challenge in a debate. :deal
     
  10. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    :patsch And another ******* bites the dust.

    Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnning

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pipTwjwrQYQ[/ame]
     
  11. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Damn it's so easy to prove *******s wrong. They are some clueless dumb mutha ****as.

    This dude pugi asked for a source so i gave it to him, PLUS MORE and he just crumbled up and made excuse after excuse like a *******s always does.
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    sometimes it's harsh but ******s like thatman needs to be scolded once in a while even though it's not their fault to be mentally handicapped in the first place.
     
  13. haworths623

    haworths623 Guest

    It is a robbery though even if you have it 115-113 because 5 is the maximum number of rounds you could give to Bradley, even if you give him all he the reasonably close rounds. I had it 9-3 myself.
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    it shows that floyd's demand has no merit and just a product of his fear when pac brutaluzed cotto. the same cotto that floyd ducked in 2008 when he was undefeated.
     
  15. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,049
    11,084
    Jan 6, 2007
    A ****in brilliant response !

    You get exposed as an idiot, and embarrassed, point by pont, as having jerked yourself off all 0ver your keyboard, and that's all you got ?


    At least it'll probably be a while before you try your fingers at 'schooling' again.:yep


    :hi:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.