PACQUIAO'S Lawsuit PROVED That PACQUIAO is CLEAN...

Course it didn't, there is one thing that would have proved he was clean and one thing only, and that was agreeing to full testing back in 09.

Even if he underwent testing tomorrow and passed it I would still suspect he was previously on something.

 

How can Pacquiao be the cleanest when he has never taken random testing ?

 

Just for debate purposes:

If PED helped an athlete get to where he is, you tend to run with it. You keep the ship moving. You act like there is nothing here to hide.

If he didn't take Floyd to court he was also risking his Reputation. He needed to put a stop to Floyd's mouth. And given Floyd had no evidence to back it, it wasn't that hard of a choice to go with it.

Marion Jones failed a test. And the Balco bust did her in. So I'm not quite sure why you are using her since there was factual evidence she used which included both a failed test and People that outed her.

Lance Armstrong also shows what someone with a big EGO will do and is willing to risk. That Guy was on top of the World and had generated Millions for Cancer Research.
As well as some others like Roger Clemens who continued to fight, fight, fight despite looking bad. But hey, maybe he is innocent.
I'm not sure how many think either of those two are innocent.

And look at Politics: Quick example: John Edwards. WOW...that was a crazy story.

So Yes, **** can go really bad when things get out and its extremely risky...but certain people have Big Egos and risky behavior. It's a part of what made them get to where they are/were in the first place.

I'm just pointing out what some of these guys are willing to risk no matter how high the stakes. And sometimes, none of it is planned. One day you are doing your thing and the next, you are on top of the World.


As for Manny, because of the poor testing system, there is going to be doubts which is why I wished he would have just went through with extra testing.
If you pass tests, the other way to catch a cheat is to get to his team and those that know him oout him...or catch him in a bust somehow.

But since this hasn't happened, you have to give him the benefit of the doubt.


I'm all for the Truth but a Part of Me is rooting for him and everyone else to be innocent. It sucks when lies are unveiled and **** comes crashing down.

 

if pac was clean he wouldn't have hid for years under commission testin

 

Maan, I'm not even gonna read that waffle.

 

he cant be until he takes random tests. pac told enough lies to last a life time on WHY he CANT test, you think he can't lie in a courtroom in that broken ass english of his?

 

He could also just be stubborn and didn't want to give into something he didn't have to do.

Now some will take that as a Champions mentality to not give in and some will take that as.....well.....something to hide because a Champion does more than what is expected of him; he goes beyond.


So what does everyone want really: Clean of Dirty?

I think that is one of my issues with the case: Some want him to be dirty so bad they will believe words from opposition (like the Mayweathers) without any real evidence you could take to court for conviction.

 

Get back to you?

Who the **** are you? I wouldn't even **** on you even if you was on fire and it was your wedding day

 

floyd was willing to prove he was clean but pac wasn't.