The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Like I said, you have 120 unofficial scorecards there, but you think all the ones that voted for Pacquiao are biased in some way?

    You better call the X-Files and let them investigate.:yikes
     
  2. ashl3y72

    ashl3y72 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,135
    54
    Jul 4, 2012
    no one was talking to you, troll. I'd rather have a debate with knuckle up than with some noob who makes **** up
     
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    I didn't say that
     
  4. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    You think the odds reflected what most insiders felt about the PAC vs DLH fight?:lol: All the media, trainers and analyst ALL had DLH winning handily before fight took place.

    And you're WRONG... Cotto threw out 145 based on the advice of his nutritionist. He said the lowest Cotto could got without suffering negative effects would be 144.
    "Cotto is a welterweight and the nutritionist is saying the lowest he can go is 144," Arum said. "Manny will be fine with that. He doesn't want a guy to get in there and injure himself by fighting at an unrealistically low weight."

    Cotto did say that he didnt' want his belts on the line but PAC said it wouldn't be worth the jump back up to WW if it wasn't for a title. So they agreed to fight for the WBO title at a catch weight of not 144.....145...just a pound under what he weighed in at for the Josh Clottey fight.

    It's easy to defend the party that's in the right.....so it baffles me why you choose to defend Floyd who admitted he was wrong. Do you kid....I'm not trying save you....it's not that serious.
     
  5. yingyang

    yingyang Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    0
    Sep 21, 2010
    When Floyd cried out Manny was a ped user, steroid user, all the *****s follows.

    And now Floyd made a statement that he never accused manny of those things.

    *****s now all saying, Floyd never accused manny.... show me proof where floyd says manny was using steroids or peds.

    damn *****s. LOL!
     
  6. Well that what you seem to be arguing?

    Or that they don't know boxing.

    No matter how many way you cut it, Marquez vs Pacquiao III was a very close fight.

    Some had it for Marquez
    Some had it a Draw
    Some had it for Pacquiao

    Deal with it:deal
     
  7. santiagoraga

    santiagoraga Your Parents Sucked Full Member

    1,785
    1
    May 14, 2012
    I hope you guys understand that this development renders the entire past few years of debate over this topic as meaningless. Now, all the damage control from here on out from the ****ing parrots who repeated the Mayweather accusations is pure comedy. This is how these things work. You rough up women, you don't bother defending yourself, you plead guilty...the end. You make unfounded accusations, you get called out on those accusations, you can't back up those allegations....you pay. It's not rocket science. Let this be a lesson to all you ***gots out there.
     
  8. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    8-4 for Marquez :deal
     
  9. A Floyd fan ducking the tough posts, you do follow your master:rofl
     
  10. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    very true. vada uses the cir test while usada does not. they only used it for the cotto fight and u saw how flat he looked against cotto :good
     
  11. ashl3y72

    ashl3y72 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,135
    54
    Jul 4, 2012
    - a lot actually picked pac to win, especially on various message boards. and what, you think "insiders" don't place bets on fights :lol: Oscar was a 2-1 favourite. Pac was hardly an underdog. Pac was the 2-1 fave against Cotto, does that mean Cotto was a huge underdog.

    who cares, it was still a catchweight bout for a paper title that a lot of people call a paper title. why are you bringing up the clottey fight? Cotto looked slow and lethargic in that one.

    I see you've completely ignored the other half of my post :yep

    :deal:hi:
     
  12. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    No, the weight penalty was demanded first. The weight penalty was demanded by Pacquiao on the 7th December 2009. Mayweather then demanded the testing on the 12th of December 2009.
     
  13. Hardly anyone had that score.

    Pacquiao also out landed Marquez in that fight.

    But the point is that it is was a close fight and you can make an argument for either fighting winning.

    Some you could not do for the Bradley fight.
     
  14. Stop lying Pacquiao was a 3/1 underdog.

    People called the fight a mismatch and that Pacquiao could get seriously hurt
     
  15. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    :nono compubox sucked for that fight

    Round 5 of Pac/Marquez III

    Pacquiao 13/45 29%
    Marquez 12/34 35%

    now watch that round and tell me that's accurate
    http://www.badlefthook.com/2011/12/...iao-vs-juan-manuel-marquez-3-full-fight-video


    I just watched the round and those numbers are a joke :lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.