Mike Tyson: Top 10 Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hands of Iron, Aug 20, 2012.

  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,862
    Likes Received:
    4,075
    ffs :rofl
     
  2. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2012
    Messages:
    14,701
    Likes Received:
    16
    :rofl :rofl

    He updated it July 2012 though.

     
  3. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2012
    Messages:
    14,701
    Likes Received:
    16
    The old list:

    :happy
     
  4. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    12,013
    Likes Received:
    3
    Borderline case IMO. Can really be argued either way.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    49,990
    Likes Received:
    17,445
    Agreed. I'd have him between 12-15 myself, but never had a problem with someone saying he's top 10. A strong enough case can certainly be made.
     
  6. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    This content is protected
     
  7. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    This content is protected
     
  8. whopperdong

    whopperdong "sorry dan, im the man" Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    4,269
    Likes Received:
    139
    If ppl say no cause Tyson didn't have enought atg on his res then how the hell does either klichsko make it.
     
  9. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2012
    Messages:
    14,701
    Likes Received:
    16
    Well said, whopperdong.
     
  10. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,862
    Likes Received:
    4,075
    They can't make it either. :good
     
  11. devon

    devon Guest

    Same with Holmes and Dempsey people have to look past some fighters resume and look at their skills more.
     
  12. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    10,060
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    That's an incredibly weak argument. Wlad has a much better reign than Tyson has and arguably hit harder, with a better KO percentage. Not too mention Wlad's longevity. Tyson was apparently shot at 22. People have different criterias bro, so if someone doesn't take H2H into account then Tyson doesn't stack up that well against some heavyweights.

    Tyson's at 10 on my list, with Wlad around 13. I can't see my self ever having Wlad above Tyson, but it's certianly not out of the question to have Wlad over Tyson.
     
  13. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think he lasted long enuf on top to be rated in the top 10. He kicked everybody's asses while he was there, but fell off before he could get his next defining test against Holy.

    Then when he came back, even tho he took back 2 of the belts, he got smoked by Holy when Holy was even more past it than he was. And he never really did **** after that.
     
  14. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,286
    Likes Received:
    108
    80's Tyson (D'amato/Rooney) yes!
     
  15. Punisher73

    Punisher73 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    15
    Easy, after he did all that you said, he sucked to finish out his career. If he would have retired after fighting Seldon and Bruno and getting the WBA/WBC titles back. He would be in the Top 10 list. After Seldon he lost the next 2 fights to Holyfield and finished out his career with a 5-5-2 record.