the what fights did you watch today\scorecard thread.

Super Flyweight and it was @ age 18 while defin8ly still growing .

Even growth in height until at least age 25 was known even as back as d 1950s or earlier .

 

You should watch Olivares against Rose, he really was at his peak there and Rose despite struggling with the weight went out on his shield and the Castillo fights. You can't just say he was knocked down so it was a wrong decision, that's ridiculous. They are great fights, you'll enjoy them and you know how good Castillo was. I've got the first and second fights with Castillo, I'll upload them when I get a chance. Watch the Arguello fight as well, it will show you how versatile he was, not just a puncher. Castillo-Rose is another good fight, If you watch it and think Castillo should of got it then fair enough but you'll see that Rose was better than you think and against somebody who I know you rate highly.

 

because they were older than him , as clearly st8ed in my post and checkable in boxrec , and already fully grown by d time that they muvd up 2 teik on him .

 

Lionel Rose does not worth d bother of watching .

This is n important part of Y I love boxrec so much , it tells me which fights and which fighters r worth d time , among many other things .

As i already st8ed , watching fights solidified my boxrec impressions much more often than not , at least past n early stage in my (development at) research of d sport .

 

Well all I can say is that it's easier to judge fighters if you actually see them. If you're gonna judge fighters just by looking at boxrec you're not gonna get the full picture and your knowledge of boxing will be flawed and your opinions mean nothing.

 

Come on Frank! Let's meet up mate :yep

 

fact is that u r wrong on all accounts .

plus (,) watching fights without boxrecing will give u d wrong impression , d RJJ illusion .

 

not sure that u know what u wishing 4 Fem

 

I want to meet you Frank! Come on mayne!!!

 

do not expect me 2 answer it here , not going 2 get myself banned because of u .

if something else did it , y not , i have better things 2do than posting here , but u will not b d cause 4 it .

 

I'm wrong in saying it's easier to judge fighters if you actually watch them?

I'm wrong in saying that you will get a bigger picture if you watch them instead of relying on boxrec?

I'm wrong in saying that your opinions will be flawed if you just rely on boxrec?

C'mon Frank you're just being stubborn now.

What's Roy Jones got to do with this anyway?

 

By the way Frank, I met up with the Fleaman last year. We had a great afternoon talking about boxing over a few pints.

 

Yeah; was ace :good

I just wanna' give summat back to the community. Wipe the dribble off Frank's chin and take him out for a walk and whatnot.

 

watching fights takes much more time than gathering many relevant facts about d fights .

And how do u judge a fighter when u lack 1 , if not some , if not all of his fights that matter ?

by watching him destroy a drained borderline bum whose claim 2 gr8ness is based on decisioning another over8ed fighter whom just happnened 2b a smaller midget and drained as well whose main claim 2 fame was decisioning 2ice another over8ed serial hometown fighter whom just accidentally happened 2b drained in those 2 occasions and fighting in d other man's backyard and even then at least 1 of those verdicts is dubious .

2nd red :
my knowledge of d sport and my opinions r clearer , more consistent and much more based on facts and correct than yours .

And it is very much possible that we have both seen about d same amount of fights by now , with myself repeating a major part of them 2 up 2 5 times .

1st i judge , then i verify my judgement by watching unless d verdict is just 2 clear , strong and obvious .

i already replied about how powerful and useful tool boxrec is 4 me , even at vbetting on fighters that i never watched even 4a sec .

RJ is some1 whom 1 might get impressed by watching him fight , .. ,

..
..

unless that 1 has a functioning brain and is aware that Jones' opponents were dead by d time that he fought them .
and usually also severely undersized .

boxrec usually tells 1 about these things , believe it or not .

Even those whom quickly destroyed him were past their prime .
1 of which was in fact drug abused and older than Jones still , and d other was of d same age and past more punishment than Jones himself due2"stylez" .

 

as if i declined his offer