How much better would Mayweather-Cotto had been at WW (2008)?

What difference would it had made in your opinion when Cotto was still undefeated offically...

thoughts please...brothers

Dipset4Ever

 

It would have been an enormous fight. Same result probably just a bit closer and all round a much bigger fight.

 

imagine an undefeated cotto who doesn't have the damages he got from margo and pacquiaio at his prime division.

 

I would have loved...the undefeated...fight also...possibly in Madison square garden the puerto ricans filling the arena...or cinco de mayo in the mgm...epic ****...

 

Still a close one, but Floyd finishes Miguel late.

 

floyd could not even finish a worned-out version.

 

You're not considering that Floyd is also better @ 147 and with 8 oz's...

 

and you're not considering that floyd is mostly a defensive fighter that time who doesn't take much risk.

 

Miguel has been taking beatings his whole career - not just by Antonio and Manny. Obviously, the worst one resulted in his first pro. loss. If there is a "decline" in either, or both, it's more apparent in Floyd.

 

Miguel seems to have this improved confidence about him that he didn't have earlier on, regardless of his battles.

 

Yeah because Floyd doesn't hit as hard as Tony or Manny.. :hey

 

would of been huge. mayweather still wins.

 

... sure doesn't... without bricks in his gloves and drugs in his blood! :-(

I'll leave you all to it. I can see most of you don't know ish.

 

Agree,also imagine if Pac had not fought a drained and damaged fighter in Cotto which he got damaged from Margarito... Freddie knew this and even admitted it which is why they fought him and not Mosley..

 

Pac is innocent until proven guilty.. :hey Even Oscar said that Pac hits Harder.. :deal