2009 - Miguel Cotto vs Manny Pacquiao @ Full 147 NOT 145, Who Wins?

This content is protected

**** YOU *****

 

Manny; Cotto was not tactically prepared by any means.

 

A floyd hater! thats nice, but I thought the thread was about cotto and pac. And btw I think you got your facts wrong. thats the cotto that Bob Arum said wasnt ready for floyd yet!

 

Pac would beat Cotto at 147 at that given time.

What would have been more interesting is if Cotto had a different trainer than the woefully inexperienced Santiago.

 

Ill still go with cotto. the combination of the catch weight and the rehydration clause is what beat cotto that night. Didnt have as much power stamina or punch resistance. But he agreed to it so its his fault.

 

In short...Cotto was shot, very shot .

 

source for this rehydration clause BS or STFU? :deal

i can give you a source that floyd does rehydration clause.

 

*****s: but floyd fought an unshot cotto.

 

Manny is better than Cotto and would stop him almost everytime and at any weight. This is not a Spinks/Hagler thing where both are ATG and Spinks would win at 175 and Hagler at 160 which is what would probably happen since both are great. but Manny is great and Cotto is very good. Manny would win almost everytime.

 

How do you think the circumstances surrounding Cotto's training camp effected him?