Why do especially Brits dislike the Klitschko brothers?

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

No other group of fans create threads like this & Ive seen loads of them on ESB

"Why do people dislike the Klits?" :barf

"Why doesnt everyone love the Klits as much as I do?" :|

Klithuggers are as emotional as teenage girls, bursting into tears whenever their heroes are criticised & constantly seeking approval thats its ok to be obsessed with 2 boxers.

Its embarrassing & pathetic, even *****s & *******s dont sink to their level.

 

i couldnt have put it better :deal

 

Like the Wlad as he seems like a good guy and Vitali is a beast in the ring.

But their fans are annoying.. take for example the comment above, basically someone saying that Wlad's win of Chagaev trumps any of Tysons' wins.

FFS Someone like Bruno would beat Chagaev and Spinks was a 31-0 gold medalist champion when Tyson beat him.

 

I don't dislike the Klits but I'm certainly no fan of them or their fighting style (or lack of). As for their fans, biggest ****s on these boards. Most of them only care about the HW division and spend most of their time either lapping up the brothers jizz or denigrating every other HW in history. The very worst of them have been shown up to be racist pieces of **** on this board time and time again, despite their own idols advocating tolerance and being fairly honourable.

 

Um, the title doesn't make sense. It should be,

"Why do people, especially Brits, dislike the Klitschko brothers?"

 

Lennox, obviously...

 

For you to say Tyson would wreck Wlad inside 4 rounds is totally absurd.:rofl
Did he score legit KO's over any tall, heavy, tall guys? Tucker? Bonecrusher Smith? Mitch Green? Douglas? Ruddock? Lewis? For Mike to beat Wladimir so violently is to claim he will somehow magically do something he never could do in reality with many attempts. That is nothing but pure nostalgia style nut hugging. Heavyweights are bigger and better today. The fights arent as exciting, due to the cerebral approach to it, but that would just make these old school legends even easier to beat.

Average weight of Ali KO victim- 197
George Foreman (only 3 kos in championship fights, btw)-213
Mike Tyson-217
Lennox Lewis-227
Wladimir Klitschko-233

As you can clearly see, the division keeps getting bigger, the champs as well as there opponents (with minor exceptions). Punching power gradually keeps rising to new, crazy levels. I have no doubt that the legit reighning champ in 15-25 years will be better straight up than Wladimir, regardless of how popular he is or how much I happen to like him.:deal

 

What do you mean?

 

Bigger doesn’t mean better, all you Klistscho nutthggers think the same just because these guys are bigger doesn’t mean ****, boxing is about skills. Skills pay the bills

You're a fool talking about old school legends easier to beat then you bring up Foreman who as we all know came back and won the title, so that proves right there that the old legends could defiantly cut it in different era's so no this isn't nostalgia.

Tyson has better wins on his resume than both the Klistscho’s and anything me and you say would be pure speculation in a match up but Tyson when he was in his prime and unbeaten intimidated the **** out his opponents. He won most of his fights before he even got in the ring, Wlad would have **** himself and once the first few punches landed with the speed and power from Tyson, Wlad would be crawling round on the floor just my opinion.

The facts are that Wlad has three losses to no marks and Lennox Lewis beat the **** out of Vitali, the klitschcos would only be contenders in the 1990's and any other decent eras.:smoke

 

Shitty bait thread. You know most of us don't dislike them, there are just some posters who dislike fanboys who happen to be British that's all.

 

Americans still are confused which Klitschko is which ....

 

They are liked to my knowledge and have made regular appearances on the Boxing program Ringside

 

Many brits dislike the Klitschko brothers because the brothers are very inconvenient for the die hard brit fans. Without Wlad and Vitali keeping the HW division in order, we would have Chisora, Haye, Fury, Price all being hyped up to ridiculous, Hatton-esque levels.

There's nothing the yellow toothed love more than hyping up B-level fighters. The Klitschko's prevent them from really getting into it. The last time their hype machine got behind a HW (Haye), it got slapped around and embarrassed.

No doubt all the brittards here will say "I don't even like Haye. I knew Wlad would win. Haye is a cruiser...the BEST CW EVER, but I don't like him". The truth is, they wanted Haye to win, and bad. However, Haye embarassed himself and his country, so they deny backing him. This is why you see a lot of passive aggressive posts from brits about the Klitschko brothers. As someone mentioned, this is the same reason you see a lot of resume smearing going on against both brothers, and now Andre Ward.

Ever notice how before the Haye fight Vitali's resume went from "decent" to "possibly the worst of any champ ever"? Notice how after both bros went through some brit HW hopefuls with ease, Chris Byrd went from "a small HW with great skills" to "a blown up middleweight who destroyed Vitali"?

To conclude: the brittards that post here are the most passive aggressive whiny ******s on ESB.

I await the thread about how Calzaghe would have slapped everyone on Ward's resume to death.

 

Slyk-- This is one of the most well thought out posts I've seen here in a while. I couldn't agree more with your assessment :good +1